Top 10 HeadSpin Alternatives List to Look For

The core objective of both code coverage and test coverage remains the measurement metrics leveraged to simplify the assessment of the quality of application code. These are significant for developers to rectify any errors if discovered and enhance the overall quality of an application.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Code_Coverage_vs_Test_Coverage_8211_Overview">1 Code Coverage vs Test Coverage &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Code_Coverage">1.1 What is Code Coverage?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Test_Coverage">1.2 What is Test Coverage?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Code_Coverage_vs_Test_Coverage_8211_A_Comparison">2 Code Coverage vs Test Coverage &#8211; A Comparison</a></li><li><a href="#Code_Coverage_vs_Test_Coverage_Which_One_Should_You_Choose">3 Code Coverage vs Test Coverage: Which One Should You Choose?</a></li><li><a href="#Summary">4 Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">5 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_code_coverage_and_feature_coverage">5.1 What is the difference between code coverage and feature coverage?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="code-coverage-vs-test-coverage-overview">Code Coverage vs Test Coverage &#8211; Overview</h2>



<h3 id="what-is-code-coverage">What is Code Coverage?</h3>



Code Coverage is the percentage of the source code executed by a test suite. It points out what has been tested and what has not been tested, thereby revealing untested paths. Tools such as JaCoCo or Istanbul usually visualize such data by pointing out areas where more tests are needed. High code coverage may imply high quality but does not guarantee it; it is a good metric for the effectiveness of testing.



<h3 id="what-is-test-coverage">What is Test Coverage?</h3>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Coverage</a> is the extent to which the testing process covers the software requirements or specifications. It ensures testing all aspects, both functional and non-functional, based on defined criteria. Sometimes, test coverage may be measured using requirement traceability matrices or similar tools.



This will help ensure that all features have been validated and verified against requirements, thus enhancing confidence in the product, though it does not coincide with the thoroughness of testing.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/how-create-best-test-case-design-get-maximum-test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How do You Ensure Test Coverage</a>



<h2 id="code-coverage-vs-test-coverage-a-comparison">Code Coverage vs Test Coverage &#8211; A Comparison</h2>



Let us look into this table to know more:



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Aspect</td><td>Code Coverage</td><td>Test Coverage</td></tr><tr><td>Definition</td><td>Measures the percentage of code executed during testing.</td><td>The extent to which testing covers requirements/specifications.</td></tr><tr><td>Advantages</td><td>Identifies untested code, helps improve code quality, provides insights into testing effectiveness, helps in refactoring, and can lead to fewer bugs in production.</td><td>Ensures all features are validated, highlights gaps in testing, enhances confidence in product quality, facilitates requirement tracking, and encourages comprehensive test design.</td></tr><tr><td>How to Measure?</td><td>Tools like JaCoCo, Istanbul, or Clover are used to track executed lines/branches.</td><td>Through requirement traceability matrices or testing frameworks that align tests with requirements.</td></tr><tr><td>Mechanisms</td><td>Instrumentation of code, Static analysis.</td><td>Mapping requirements to test cases and test case reviews.</td></tr><tr><td>Tools</td><td>JaCoCo, Istanbul, Clover.</td><td>TestRail, HP ALM, Jira (with plugins).</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage-techniques/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Coverage Techniques</a>



<h2 id="h-code-coverage-vs-test-coverage-which-one-should-you-choose">Code Coverage vs Test Coverage: Which One Should You Choose?</h2>



It’s now time to address the elephant in the room – code coverage vs test coverage: which one to choose and why. As both of these are completely different measurement approaches, it won’t be justified to choose between the two. Code coverage is a quantitative measure and is more related to the <a href="https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-engineering-white-box-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">white-box testing</a> technique. While on the other hand, test coverage is a qualitative measure and a black-box testing approach.&nbsp;



So there’s no exact answer to this question &#8220;code coverage vs test coverage: which one to choose &#8220;, as it would entirely depend on your business requirements and the intricacy of the software application. In a majority of the cases, however, both test coverage and code coverage are used.



<h2 id="h-summary">Summary</h2>



People have always mistaken both test coverage and code coverage to be the same term. But they don’t have anything in common!



For all the testers, having an in-depth analysis of code coverage and test coverage is vital. Not only do these techniques offer efficient testing, but also help developers save hundreds of hours and executives save resources.



Additionally, 100% code coverage should not be sought at any stage of SDLC because it will end up wasting more time and resources as developers would miss out on vital testing modules when short at the time. None of the code coverage or test coverage is a perfect choice, but you should try both of them for a considerable amount of time. The combo would most likely yield the ideal results.



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="what-is-the-difference-between-code-coverage-and-feature-coverage">What is the difference between code coverage and feature coverage?</h3>



Code coverage measures the percentage of code executed during tests, while feature coverage assesses whether all specified features or functionalities are tested.&nbsp;





Test Coverage Metrics
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="qUh8jJzk0z"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage-metrics/">Test Coverage Metrics &#8211; A Complete Overview</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Test Coverage Metrics &#8211; A Complete Overview&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage-metrics/embed/#?secret=9eK50ZbHwN#?secret=qUh8jJzk0z" data-secret="qUh8jJzk0z" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>


Test Automation Coverage
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="fdeFMof11F"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-coverage/">Test Automation Coverage | What it is &amp; How to Improve it?</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Test Automation Coverage | What it is &amp; How to Improve it?&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-coverage/embed/#?secret=hgeV90fGLl#?secret=fdeFMof11F" data-secret="fdeFMof11F" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>


Flutter Test Coverage
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ORgMsVPya3"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/flutter-test-coverage/">Flutter Test Coverage | How to Generate &amp; Analyse Report?</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Flutter Test Coverage | How to Generate &amp; Analyse Report?&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/flutter-test-coverage/embed/#?secret=nATJX4qKCO#?secret=ORgMsVPya3" data-secret="ORgMsVPya3" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>


Test Coverage Techniques
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="2w6vGo385P"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage-techniques/">Test Coverage Techniques Used In Software Testing</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Test Coverage Techniques Used In Software Testing&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage-techniques/embed/#?secret=IxYkrbLA4c#?secret=2w6vGo385P" data-secret="2w6vGo385P" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

feature image of Code Coverage vs Test Coverage

Code Coverage vs Test Coverage: Differences You Need to Know

When it comes to automation testing, Worksoft Certify has impressed thousands of users. However, this automation platform has also been chided for its inability to work properly with web-based applications and for not being open-source.



If Worksoft doesn’t work for your business, it&#8217;s time to start looking for a smart and efficient alternative. In this post, we list some of the best Worksoft alternatives.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><ul><li><a href="#Worksoft_Certify_Why_is_this_Automated_Testing_Platform_so_popular">0.1 Worksoft Certify: Why is this Automated Testing Platform so popular</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#5_Best_Worksoft_Alternatives">1 5 Best Worksoft Alternatives </a><ul><li><a href="#1_Testsigma">1.1 1. Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#2_Tricentis_Tosca">1.2 2. Tricentis Tosca</a><ul><li><a href="#Worksoft_Vs_Tricentis_Tosca_8211_Which_One_Shows_Better_Regression_Testing">1.2.1 Worksoft Vs. Tricentis Tosca &#8211; Which One Shows Better Regression Testing?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#3_Katalon_Studio">1.3 3. Katalon Studio</a><ul><li><a href="#Worksoft_Vs_Katalon_Studio_8211_How_Are_They_Different">1.3.1 Worksoft Vs. Katalon Studio &#8211; How Are They Different?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#4_LambdaTest">1.4 4. LambdaTest</a><ul><li><a href="#Worksoft_Vs_LambdaTest_differences">1.4.1 Worksoft Vs. LambdaTest: differences</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#5_Micro_Focus">1.5 5. Micro Focus</a><ul><li><a href="#Worksoft_Certify_Vs_Micro_Focus_8211_Which_Is_a_Better_Option_for_Performance_Testing">1.5.1 Worksoft Certify Vs. Micro Focus &#8211; Which Is a Better Option for Performance Testing?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Final_Words">1.6 Final Words</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h3 id="h-worksoft-certify-why-is-this-automated-testing-platform-so-popular">Worksoft Certify: Why is this Automated Testing Platform so popular</h3>



From automation testing for packaged software to enterprise applications, Worksoft Certify has shown a lot of growth over the past few years. Apart from running web automation tests, this tool has shown remarkable success in functional testing, regression testing, and performance testing.



It also has the ability to automate web applications without seeking assistance from any intermediary tool. You can also improve your business process outcomes and develop operational efficiencies with the help of this tool. It comes with cross-browser support and has the capability to work with different platforms like Java, Web, Desktop, etc.



One of the main reasons why users prefer this tool is because of its seamless SAP automation testing. This is the best tool for the SAP platform, which is why it has gained so much fame among software developers. The initial setup is pretty easy, and the online customer support system is very cooperative.



With so many benefits, this tool could have been the best tool for web apps if it did not have some major drawbacks.&nbsp;



This test automation tool cannot customize the test data results and does not bear a powerful OCR framework for managing automated tests. There is also minimum flexibility in test management due to no involvement in coding.



One of the biggest disadvantages of Worksoft is that it is not an open-source tool. So, this tool tends to have slower automated testing, pricier license, and limited options when working with web-based apps.



Although Worksoft Certify has an effective role in test automation, regression testing, and performance testing, its limitations are still difficult to get past. This is why you need some excellent Worksoft Certify alternatives to manage your projects and apps.



<h2 id="h-5-best-worksoft-alternatives">5 Best Worksoft Alternatives </h2>



Finding an automated testing platform can be a challenging task, especially when there are so many to choose from. Have a look at our top alternatives for Worksoft Certify-



<h3 id="1-testsigma">1. <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Testsigma</a></h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/oZaz9IIyOKWOJszaFGeo0Dd3wduKm7eT5jeOJDgPy4TzcmmQWcr1COaS_fpmFD3oDWiS-VSz1MYGQ0Fg2zZ46qNYaa9qSr8YzhBZ17D8riyCln8to7D5B3oajDd1xnq6tCP5THsFSHr-lHKe5Q" alt="Testsigma" /></figure></div>



When it comes to automation tests, <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma </a>can do just about everything. From functional testing to <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/how-to-measure-when-testing-is-enough/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">data driven</a> testing, to parallelization, cross-browser testing, multi-device end-to-end testing and visual testing, there&#8217;s nothing you can&#8217;t achieve with Testsigma.



This test automation tool has been developed to fully support mobile testing, web testing, and API testing. Beginners with minimum HTML knowledge can easily work with this tool, as it doesn&#8217;t require a lot of coding expertise.



Testsigma works without any coded setup, so a wide range of users, from testers to engineers, can use it freely. Testsigma is also one of the few leading <a href="https://github.com/testsigmahq/testsigma" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">open source alternatives to Worksoft</a>. This free version is not possible with Worksoft. With Testsigma, the ease of use and flexibility has opened doors to QA engineers, software development engineers in test (SDET) as well as QA analysts and manual testers. It allows you to write or generate automated tests for web, mobile apps, and APIs in plain English, which makes them easy to create, edit, and maintain.



You can enjoy the live support and 24/7 online support from the customer service team of Testsigma. Among the highlights are its complete test management platform, making it a Salesforce for test automation, and its built-in integration with a wide range of CICD tools like Codeship, CircleCI, GitHub, LT Browser and more for the most cohesively automated pipeline.&nbsp;



<h3 id="2-tricentis-tosca">2. Tricentis Tosca</h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Jhqwc5P1mTOdXN-9_yOjnV7HUXoXSmO5cVd-A9aF9Cf_W-uyDRVMD8AaBhvPc2NRz9q0BZxJr5ldx6QBEIphWZa6MtLEXaDwvP8CsJLwCGykOtybNzfPshQbcrFFZM7X0SNbGuRdR14JOCAwQg" alt="Tricentis Tosca" /></figure></div>



One of the best alternatives that you can consider for Worksoft Certify is the Tricentis Tosca solution. The reason why this one is so popular in the market is because of its ability to provide a codeless and user-friendly experience.&nbsp;



If you&#8217;re in need of a testing platform for UI-based scenarios for your applications, Tricentis Tosca should be a good choice. Not only does it perform a better job at real device testing, but it also has decent reporting and analytics.



<h4 id="h-worksoft-vs-tricentis-tosca-which-one-shows-better-regression-testing">Worksoft Vs. Tricentis Tosca &#8211; Which One Shows Better Regression Testing?</h4>



Tricentis Tosca is definitely a better cloud solution for regression testing compared to Worksoft. Worksoft shows limitations to functional test automation, which is not the case with Tricentis.&nbsp;



Tricentis covers a lot of testing options starting from software testing, mobile testing, application development, and so on.&nbsp;



Tricentis Tosca has pricing flexibility, smooth end to end testing and ability to integrate with NeoLoad, DATPROF, HexaWise, and so on. This is one of the better tools for security testing and cross-browser testing.



If you&#8217;re an amateur at test execution and you want something that will not require coding knowledge, Tricentis Tosca is right up your alley.



<h3 id="3-katalon-studio">3. Katalon Studio</h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/xS-13Wd_TE7uijt7-OQuesgL0Ooj21QRiZpaUjKe8IA8xVEQPLzB-kcmlnQpdJz-ko18bPkaFB6kPAp3Z08Elx4AF1LscjUWDuz83r_EEmVGdGUoFAp5tJmq1_sEHwJAqfD7yZ6fJlKLwXhu7w" alt="Katalon Studio" /></figure></div>



This is an evergreen test automation tool designed to provide the fastest and most efficient service to software testers, development teams, and business enterprises.



It comes with built-in project templates to make the automation quick and easy. You can also find ready-made test case libraries and object cache to start your test automation as fast as possible.&nbsp;



Katalon Studio makes the execution of tests simpler and easier, generates automated tests in a wide range of browsers, and performs API testing effortlessly.



<h4 id="worksoft-vs-katalon-studio-how-are-they-different">Worksoft Vs. Katalon Studio &#8211; How Are They Different?</h4>



When it comes to a flawless end to end testing, Katalon Studio does a better job than Worksoft. Katalon Studio supports both Windows and Mac. Its free version is an amazing opportunity for beginners to easily learn and achieve test automation skills. This test tool also does a great job with functional, mobile, automated, and API testing, which is not possible with Worksoft. Worksoft also lags behind in parameterized testing and supporting parallel execution, both of which are perfectly supported by Katalon Studio. One feature that we admired about this test tool is it has a user-friendly approach and targets testers and developers of all kinds of fields. From beginners to experts, everyone can have an amazing experience with this tool. The recording utility ensures maximum reusability by securing all the UI attributes. If you&#8217;re looking for a nice, well rounded test automation tool, Katalon Studio is going to do wonders for you.



<h3 id="4-lambdatest">4. LambdaTest</h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/6DP95A202m3U-P6r2TeuSxxgUvt3jqHN2Bg3-ejKHV-nGdbDmVPrKhIRhj4jv5dZYannFK5tdOsl390eo8FkDU7gqInYYcpDj90npvQNZVyqZdPINczlwqIPCTdfBkYfzRHQPrnQhx4sC2ZAFQ" alt="LambdaTest" /></figure></div>



LambdaTest has been one of the most popular functional testing cloud solutions for a long time. Its ability to manage and supervise scalable automated tests has always fascinated software testers and developers.



This tool helps to obtain maximum browser coverage by running tests over multiple browsers, real mobile devices, and mobile applications. It also comes with a safe and secure Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests in a short duration of time.&nbsp;



Besides, the addition of the Cypress CLI in this tool assists in broadening the Cypress test coverage to a wide range of browsers across different platforms.



LambdaTest also has a big role in conducting seamless manual testing, functional mobile testing, and visual UI tests.



<h4 id="worksoft-vs-lambdatest-differences">Worksoft Vs. LambdaTest: differences</h4>



When it comes to automated testing, LambdaTest is one step ahead of Worksoft. Its capability to support Windows, Mac and SAAS makes this software better than many other tools in the market.



LambdaTest targets a much bigger audience of developers of web and mobile applications, SAAS business companies, software companies, and QA analysts. But with Worksoft, the audience is limited to only software testers and developers.



The 24/7 live support feature of LambdaTest is a blessing to many testers and engineers, which is not possible with Worksoft. To make things easier, LambdaTest also comes with a free trial and free version features. Worksoft does not provide such a feature.



The performance and test automation capacities of LambdaTest, with its functional software testing, parallel execution, requirement-based testing, and reporting features are great.



Another notable feature of this tool is its integrations with a large number of web-based services like Jira Software and Work Management, Backlog, BitBucket, and GitHub. We also liked the incorporation of Selenium Grid and Cypress CLI to ensure better browser coverage for operating devices and systems.



If your biggest concerns are smooth automated testing, running seamless manual tests, and controlling the pace of test cases, LambdaTest will not disappoint you.



<h3 id="5-micro-focus">5. Micro Focus</h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/hGriZukEaaV09hUCPhv-PTG1XDBkPkfzhJnIgsnaQ87Gici6SjSRXBEf21VaHUwP3-BFcRhBXoUG94uU24CQsaIVFNNdymi1VjcII4aR2v6CV4qZJrbEABE4eQnlVCue8yCTJtuINK6secn94A" alt="Micro focus" /></figure></div>



If you&#8217;ve been in the software testing industry for quite some time, you must have heard of the automation platform Micro Focus UFT One.



This automation tool covers test automation for web applications, mobile applications, mainframe applications, and desktop-based applications. It works at a faster pace than most testing tools and does a satisfactory job at performance testing. The free version of this tool is very convenient for occasional testers and software developers.



<h4 id="h-worksoft-certify-vs-micro-focus-which-is-a-better-option-for-performance-testing">Worksoft Certify Vs. Micro Focus &#8211; Which Is a Better Option for Performance Testing?</h4>



When it comes to conducting smooth performance tests, Micro Focus is definitely a better automation platform compared to Worksoft.



Its ability to carry out API testing is phenomenal. Worksoft only deals with automated and functional testing, so its testing options are quite limited. However, with Micro Focus, you can try out a lot of testing options, including regression, software, and interface testing.



Micro Focus shows an impressive end to end test automation performance in comparison to different tools. From AI testing to integration with different test assets, Micro Focus provided an accelerated testing service.



<h3 id="h-final-words">Final Words</h3>



We hope our list of the top Worksoft Certify alternatives can help you in choosing an automation tool that can work with test execution and improve mobile application and web browser performance.



We recommend choosing Testsigma as Worksoft alternative because of their intelligent end to end test automation abilities, scalable pricing, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/integrations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">integrations</a>.

cover image of worksoft alternative article

5 Best Worksoft Alternatives [Updated]

8 Best Zephyr Alternatives [In-Depth Comparison]

In today’s article, we will be doing a comparison of Ranorex vs Selenium. We’ll be discussing the many platforms they’re compatible with, their performance, and many other factors. Stay tuned to find out amongst these automation tools which one’s the perfect match for you.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Overview_of_Ranorex_vs_Selenium">1 Overview of Ranorex vs Selenium</a></li><li><a href="#Ranorex_vs_Selenium_8211_Key_Differences">2 Ranorex vs Selenium &#8211; Key Differences</a><ul><li><a href="#Ranorex_and_Selenium_Price">2.1 Ranorex and Selenium Price </a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">3 Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="overview-of-ranorex-vs-selenium">Overview of Ranorex vs Selenium</h2>



Ranorex



The Ranorex Studio is an excellent tool that works very smoothly for test automation. It doesn’t have its own scripting language, so it uses other standard programming languages like C# and&nbsp;VB.NET&nbsp;for automating tests.



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1420" height="799" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230617/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-2.png" alt="selenium" class="wp-image-47925" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230617/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-2.png 1420w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230617/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-2-768x432.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1420px) 100vw, 1420px" /></figure>



This GUI test automation tool is used for desktop web and mobile applications testing. It can support a wide range of operating systems, which include Windows, Android, and iOS. For automated bug tracking, Ranorex studio has built-in integrations with leading tools such as Jenkins, Jira, and TestRail happen. &nbsp;



Thanks to its excellent object-based capture and replay editor, and record replay and edit actions, users get the ability to easily create automated software tests for their web browsers and desktop applications. Because the Ranorex studio has impressive UI elements, this tool is a good option for non-programmers as well.



Parallel testing with Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and many more browsers can be done during web testing, for faster results.&nbsp;



There is no need for jailbreaking with iOS devices or with other mobile platforms when doing iOS application automated testing. Lastly, you can record your test steps in the Ranorex studio with the Ranorex recorder.



Read here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/ranorex-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ranorex Alternatives</a>



Selenium



As you may know, Selenium is an automation test tool for web browsers, with Appium as its native mobile app counterpart. With this tool, you will be able to create scripts in several programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, PHP, Ruby, etc. 



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1420" height="799" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230714/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-1-1.png" alt="selenium" class="wp-image-47928" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230714/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-1-1.png 1420w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/16230714/Rainbows-Daily-Agenda-Slide-1-1-768x432.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1420px) 100vw, 1420px" /></figure>



Selenium WebDriver is popular with SDETs since it’s open-source and one of the oldest tools that automation testing has relied on. Thus, it has APIs, libraries, drivers, and frameworks for multiple use-cases contributed by the massive community. The WebDriver has a client upon whose command the browser-specific driver runs tests. You must keep in mind that Selenium is to automate web browsers only.



Parallel testing is made possible by the Selenium Grid, and it does a great job at reducing the runtime of the tests. The Grid is a smart server, and it has two components the Hub, which is the server, and the Node, which is the remote device. You will, however, need to create and maintain the infrastructure for servers and devices yourself or use cloud-based test labs like SauceLabs or Lambdatest.&nbsp;



Read here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/selenium-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Selenium Alternatives</a>



<h2 id="ranorex-vs-selenium-key-differences">Ranorex vs Selenium &#8211; Key Differences</h2>



With a brief review of Ranorex and the overview of Selenium, you may be able to tell which one is better for you, but the detailed comparison below will give you a clear solution for sure.



Supported application types 



Between Ranorex test automation project and Selenium, we must say that Ranorex studio is more versatile in terms of compatibility as it can support desktop web and mobile application tests without additional framework setup.&nbsp;



On the other hand, Selenium was developed to automate test execution of web browsers, and not mobile or desktop applications. Both of these tools work perfectly well with most common web applications such as Windows, opera, Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and more.



Both of them support you to create test scripts in a programming language like Java, Python, C#, and many others.&nbsp;



Scalability



With the help of Selenium grid, you can get test results very quickly during the automation of your browser. Its central station distributes the web applications to several virtual and physical servers to speed up the test automation and get solutions quickly. Not all Selenium tools come with such parallel test features.&nbsp;



However, the Ranorex studio comes with parallel test features, which makes it faster in some cases.&nbsp;



Setup and your first automated tests



If you&#8217;re setting up the automation framework on your own, and you don’t know how to code, Selenium is going to be tricky. Ranorex studio has an easier setup. Selenium on its own is just a browser component. To make it useful as a test automation framework, you need to install relevant libraries for the programming languages that are available.



While you shouldn&#8217;t face much trouble using any of the two tools, the Ranorex studio is definitely more user-friendly. As we have mentioned before, it has a great capture and replay editor, which ensures you don&#8217;t have to write any code for creating tests.&nbsp;



The Ranorex studio easily does data driven testing by setting up data tables and Excel files.&nbsp;



<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/strings-in-javascript/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Selenium WebDriver</a> has autocomplete, and Ranorex studio has predictive code completion, and both of them work similarly.&nbsp;



Object Identification



Although there are many automation software out there, not many of them can locate UI elements like text boxes and buttons easily.&nbsp;



To move along an HTML object tree, both of these test tools use a type of Xpath expression. Yet maintenance with Selenium is much more difficult. This is because <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/xpath-in-selenium/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Xpath in Selenium</a> can only be used on the code level.



On the contrary, the Ranorex studio has an object repository that helps arrange all the UI elements when it&#8217;s time to do automation tests.&nbsp;



On top of that, editing and even creating Xpath expression is made easier with the help of the Ranorex spy tool. Using these UI repository elements in the Ranorex studio software for object identification helps to make your code cleaner and readable.&nbsp;



In comparison to the Ranorex, the Selenium WebDriver also has more of a tough time trying to identify and locate UI elements with dynamic IDs.



Debugging and Reporting



Selenium-based frameworks are inherently customizable but are still limited in terms of test execution reports. Meanwhile, Ranorex studio reporting is easier to comprehend and more actionable. It is also very simple to share and comes in different formats such as JUnit, PDF, and HTML. Both of them will provide you with recordings of the test runs, which is very helpful when debugging.&nbsp;



<h3 id="ranorex-and-selenium-price">Ranorex and Selenium Price </h3>



Along with all the features, the price of the automated testing software also plays a major role when you&#8217;re in the market.&nbsp;



Selenium is open source, which means that it is a free tool, and anyone can access it.&nbsp;Ranorex Studio starts at $3,950 for a license.&nbsp;



You will get a free trial for Ranorex, and in this free trial, you can find out whether you it’d be a good investment for you.&nbsp;



<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



We hope our detailed comparison of Ranorex vs Selenium was able to help you finally come to a decision.&nbsp; Read here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/comparison-automated-testing-tools-selenium-testsigma" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma vs Selenium</a>



Both of them are excellent choices, but if we had to pick one without the price in mind, we would have to say that the Ranorex studio has a much better performance. However, if you already have a team of developers you can assign solely to setting up and maintaining your <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-frameworks/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation framework </a>and all the automated tests (to avoid flakiness), you can always use Selenium.



Unlike Ranorex, <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a> is open-source and supports end-to-end web, mobile app, and API testing. Unlike Selenium, Testsigma does it all without code. With Tetsigma, you get the best of both worlds. Try it for free today, or check out the repo on <a href="https://github.com/testsigmahq/testsigma" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Github</a>.&nbsp;

Wait a second...Did you try Testsigma?

Wait a second...
Did you try Testsigma?