
<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Salesforce_Scale_Center"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Salesforce Scale Center</a></li><li><a href="#When_to_Use_Scale_Center"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> When to Use Scale Center</a></li><li><a href="#Key_Features_of_Salesforce_Scale_Center"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Key Features of Salesforce Scale Center</a></li><li><a href="#Salesforce_Scale_Center_Benefits"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Salesforce Scale Center Benefits</a></li><li><a href="#Salesforce_Scale_Center_Use_Cases"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Salesforce Scale Center Use Cases</a></li><li><a href="#Salesforce_Scale_Center_Offerings_as_Graphs"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Salesforce Scale Center Offerings as Graphs</a><ul><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.1</span> Conclusion</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="salesforce-scale-center"><span id="Salesforce_Scale_Center"><strong>Salesforce Scale Center</strong></span></h2>



<p>Salesforce Scale Center is a feature introduced by Salesforce to help businesses manage and optimize their use of Salesforce applications at scale. <strong>Salesforce Scale Center</strong> is designed to provide enterprises with tools to manage their Salesforce instances more effectively, especially as they grow and become more complex. It focuses on operational excellence, ensuring that large-scale implementations run smoothly and efficiently. It helps developers to diagnose root causes and act on scale issues earlier in their development cycle. The developers can also view org performance metrics and analyze performance reports.</p>



<h2 id="h-when-to-use-scale-center"><span id="When_to_Use_Scale_Center"><strong>When to Use Scale Center</strong></span></h2>



<p>For regular users, the question remains when to use the scale center? If you query is around any of the following points, you need to use it:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Before Major Releases</strong>: Evaluate the performance impact of significant updates or new features before they go live.</li><li><strong>During Development Cycles</strong>: Incorporate performance measurements into the regular development and testing process to catch potential issues early</li><li><strong>Post-Implementation Review</strong>:Assess the impact of recent changes or enhancements on overall system performance.</li><li><strong>Scalability Testing</strong>:Ensure that your applications can handle increased load and usage without degradation in performance.</li><li><strong>Regular Health Checks</strong>:Continuously monitor and maintain the performance of your Salesforce org to prevent issues before they arise.</li><li><strong>Performance Optimization</strong>: Identify areas for improvement and optimize performance as part of ongoing maintenance efforts.</li></ul>



<p>By using Scale Center in these scenarios, you can proactively manage and enhance the scalability and performance of your Salesforce applications, ensuring a seamless and enriched user experience. To identify potential bottlenecks and optimize system performance, testers should regularly monitor the following:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Transition times between different pages</strong>: Monitor the duration it takes for users to move between different pages within the Salesforce application. Extended transition times can signal issues with page loading, data retrieval, or other performance-related challenges.</li><li><strong>Components taking longer to load on the page</strong>:Components like dashboards, reports, or custom elements (Aura, LWC, Visualforce) should load swiftly to provide a seamless user experience. Slow loading times may point to inefficiencies in rendering these components or issues within the underlying code.</li><li><strong>Response time for actions performed on buttons or quick actions</strong>:Actions triggered by user interactions, especially those linked to buttons or clickable elements, should exhibit swift response times. Delayed response times may point to underlying issues in executing these action items.</li><li><strong>Salesforce API call durations</strong>:Monitor the time it takes Salesforce API calls to complete, including CRUD operations or web service calls. Prolonged durations may indicate network issues, job bottlenecks, inefficient queries, or other factors affecting API performance.</li><li><strong>Trigger-related delays in overall execution</strong>:Triggers are event-driven pieces that respond to specific data manipulation events, such as creating, updating, or deleting records. These delays could be due to inefficient code, large data volume, or complex logic.</li><li><strong>Execution time of Apex Jobs used in tests</strong>:Track the time taken for Apex Jobs used in <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/test-scenario/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing scenarios</a>. Prolonged execution times may highlight performance bottlenecks within custom code or job bottlenecks, affecting overall system efficiency.</li></ul>



<p>Suppose these behaviors are observed, such as extended execution times in functional UI workflows. In that case, delays in Salesforce API responses, prolonged execution of Apex Jobs or triggers, or irregular logins, Scale Center is a perfect place to start, as it provides a comprehensive overview, offering insights into the factors contributing to performance spikes within a specific time frame. Utilizing Scale Center allows you to reach the root of the problem and address the performance issues effectively.</p>



<h2 id="h-key-features-of-salesforce-scale-center"><span id="Key_Features_of_Salesforce_Scale_Center"><strong>Key Features of Salesforce Scale Center</strong></span></h2>



<ol><li><strong>Performance Monitoring</strong>: Real-time monitoring of Salesforce performance to ensure that all applications and processes are running optimally. This includes tracking system health, identifying bottlenecks, and providing insights to improve system performance.</li><li><strong>Capacity Planning</strong>: Tools to help businesses plan for future growth by forecasting capacity needs. This includes managing data storage, user activity, and system load to ensure that Salesforce can handle increasing demands.</li><li><strong>Governance and Compliance</strong>: Features to help businesses adhere to regulatory requirements and internal policies. This includes data governance, audit trails, and compliance reporting to ensure that all activities within Salesforce meet required standards.</li><li><strong>Automation and Optimization</strong>: Automated tools to optimize Salesforce operations. This includes automating routine tasks, optimizing workflows, and suggesting best practices to improve efficiency and reduce manual intervention. Read here &#8211;  <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/salesforce-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Salesforce Testing</a></li><li><strong>Scalability Solutions</strong>: Tools to help businesses scale their Salesforce applications seamlessly. This includes managing large volumes of data, high numbers of users, and complex integrations with other systems.</li><li><strong>Security and Risk Management</strong>: Enhanced security features to protect sensitive data and manage risks. This includes monitoring for security threats, managing user access, and ensuring data privacy.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-salesforce-scale-center-benefits"><span id="Salesforce_Scale_Center_Benefits"><strong>Salesforce Scale Center Benefits</strong></span></h2>



<ul><li><strong>Improved Operational Efficiency</strong>: By automating routine tasks and optimizing workflows, businesses can reduce manual effort and improve overall efficiency.</li><li><strong>Enhanced Performance and Reliability</strong>: Real-time monitoring and performance management ensure that Salesforce applications run smoothly and reliably.</li><li><strong>Scalability</strong>: Tools for capacity planning and scalability help businesses grow their Salesforce implementations without disruption.</li><li><strong>Better Governance and Compliance</strong>: Enhanced governance and compliance features help businesses meet regulatory requirements and maintain internal standards.</li><li><strong>Increased Security</strong>: Advanced security features protect against threats and ensure data privacy, helping businesses manage risks effectively.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-salesforce-scale-center-use-cases"><span id="Salesforce_Scale_Center_Use_Cases"><strong>Salesforce Scale Center Use Cases</strong></span></h2>



<ul><li><strong>Large Enterprises</strong>: Companies with complex Salesforce implementations and high volumes of data can use Scale Center to manage their operations more effectively.</li><li><strong>Growing Businesses</strong>: Organizations experiencing rapid growth can leverage Scale Center to ensure their Salesforce applications can scale seamlessly with their expanding needs.</li><li><strong>Regulated Industries</strong>: Businesses in industries with strict regulatory requirements can benefit from the governance and compliance features of Scale Center to ensure they meet all necessary standards.</li></ul>



<h2 id="salesforce-scale-center-offerings-as-graphs"><span id="Salesforce_Scale_Center_Offerings_as_Graphs"><strong>Salesforce Scale Center Offerings as Graphs</strong></span></h2>



<p>Scale center offers many types of analysis and health check of your systems via graphs.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXfO6R1nOwB-YWc3MdoKY4UttsNJcxiRSeScxuLooJ2ATAh1bfcTPcwPnCZ8oqG85eOHt0bZFk4ZuT59N5TeBgU3vmybLy0melnmRbihibinTp02g0XP76YGvYYj-79ESLGevt_W0tcWTDsIhV33MHPEPM3o?key=w6xLzd7q-8LZtdmEl1M1_Q" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" /></figure>



<h3 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h3>



<p>Salesforce Scale Center is a comprehensive solution for managing and optimizing Salesforce at scale. By providing tools for <a href="https://firebase.google.com/products/performance" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">performance monitoring</a>, capacity planning, governance, automation, and security, it helps businesses ensure their Salesforce implementations are efficient, reliable, and scalable. This makes it an essential tool for large enterprises and growing businesses that rely heavily on Salesforce for their operations.</p>





Salesforce Testing
https://testsigma.com/guides/salesforce-testing/


Salesforce UI Testing
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="f2NdnPJQ2B"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/salesforce-ui-testing/">Salesforce UI Testing: How to Automate With Testsigma</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Salesforce UI Testing: How to Automate With Testsigma&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/salesforce-ui-testing/embed/#?secret=YThem3VkID#?secret=f2NdnPJQ2B" data-secret="f2NdnPJQ2B" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>


Salesforce Regression Testing
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="VsaMKyKlUL"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/salesforce-regression-testing/">Salesforce Regression Testing: Benefits and Best Practices</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Salesforce Regression Testing: Benefits and Best Practices&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/salesforce-regression-testing/embed/#?secret=0dMpUFlchh#?secret=VsaMKyKlUL" data-secret="VsaMKyKlUL" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>




Salesforce Scale Center: Tester’s Edition


<p>Desk checking is an essential technique in software development and testing that involves a thorough manual review of source code. It is one of the first lines of defense against bugs and errors, providing a unique opportunity for developers and testers to understand and verify code before it proceeds to more formal testing phases. This technique not only aids in detecting errors but also enhances the overall quality and reliability of the software product.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Desk_Checking_in_software_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is Desk Checking in software testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_Desk_Checking"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Advantages of Desk Checking</a></li><li><a href="#Best_Practices_in_Desk_Checking"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Best Practices in Desk Checking</a></li><li><a href="#Use_Case_Desk_Checking_for_an_E-commerce_Application"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Use Case: Desk Checking for an E-commerce Application</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-desk-checking-in-software-testing"><span id="What_is_Desk_Checking_in_software_testing"><strong>What is Desk Checking in software testing?</strong></span></h2>



<p>In the realm of <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a>, desk checking is considered a static testing method where code is analyzed manually without executing it. The process involves a developer or a tester going through the code line by line to check for logical errors, syntax inconsistencies, and compliance with coding standards and requirements. This method can be conducted by the coder who wrote the software, a peer, or a testing professional, often involving discussions or sessions where the logic and approach of the code are debated and scrutinized.</p>



<h2 id="advantages-of-desk-checking"><span id="Advantages_of_Desk_Checking"><strong>Advantages of Desk Checking</strong></span></h2>



<p>Desk checking offers multiple advantages that make it an invaluable tool in the software development lifecycle:</p>



<ol><li><strong>Early Error Detection</strong>: By identifying errors at an early stage, desk checking helps in mitigating the costs associated with later stages of testing and maintenance.</li><li><strong>Improved Code Quality</strong>: As errors are detected and fixed early, the overall quality of the code improves, leading to more stable and reliable software.</li><li><strong>Enhanced Understanding</strong>: This technique provides testers and developers with a deeper understanding of the code&#8217;s functionality and logic, which is crucial for effective testing and maintenance.</li><li><strong>Cost</strong>&#8211;<strong>Effective</strong>: It is a cost-effective method of testing as it does not require any additional tools or software and can significantly reduce the future costs of debugging and development.</li><li><strong>Facilitates</strong> <strong>Collaboration</strong>: Desk checking often involves multiple members of the development team, fostering better communication and collaboration, and shared understanding of the project goals and methodologies.</li></ol>



<h2 id="best-practices-in-desk-checking"><span id="Best_Practices_in_Desk_Checking"><strong>Best Practices in Desk Checking</strong></span></h2>



<p>To maximize the effectiveness of desk checking, consider the following best practices:</p>



<ol><li><strong>Include Diverse Team Members</strong>: Engage individuals from different backgrounds such as development, testing, and design to provide multiple perspectives.</li><li><strong>Prepare and Plan</strong>: Ensure that the code is well-documented and that all necessary materials (such as requirements, design documents, and coding standards) are available before the session.</li><li><strong>Use Checklists</strong>: Develop checklists based on common error patterns in previous projects to ensure that critical aspects are not overlooked.</li><li><strong>Record Findings</strong>: Document all observations and decisions made during the desk check for future reference and action.</li><li><strong>Follow Up</strong>: It’s essential to address the findings from desk checking promptly. Plan follow-up sessions if needed to verify that corrections are properly implemented.</li></ol>



<p><strong>While conducting desk checks, there are certain pitfalls that need to be avoided:</strong></p>



<ol><li><strong>Overlooking Complexity</strong>: Complex pieces of code should be given extra attention and might require more time or a different approach to thoroughly understand and check.</li><li><strong>Bias</strong>: There can be a tendency to overlook errors in one&#8217;s own code or to not critique a peer’s code thoroughly. An unbiased approach is critical.</li><li><strong>Inadequate Preparation</strong>: Without proper preparation, desk checking sessions can be less productive. Participants should be well-prepared with a good understanding of the code and related documents.</li><li><strong>Lack of Engagement</strong>: All participants should be actively involved in the process to provide insights and identify potential issues.</li></ol>



<h2 id="use-case-desk-checking-for-an-e-commerce-application"><span id="Use_Case_Desk_Checking_for_an_E-commerce_Application"><strong>Use Case: Desk Checking for an E-commerce Application</strong></span></h2>



<p><strong>Scenario:</strong></p>



<p>An e-commerce company is developing a new feature for their online shopping platform that allows users to apply multiple discount codes at checkout. The development team has just completed the initial coding phase of this feature.</p>



<p><strong>Steps</strong>:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Preparation</strong>: <ul><li>Developer prepares the code and documentation, including the logic flow and any assumptions made during development. </li><li>A meeting is called to conduct the desk check.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Initial Review</strong>:<ul><li>Developer presents the code, explaining the logic they implemented to handle multiple discount codes and how they interact with existing features like promotional discounts and loyalty points.</li><li>QA engineer reviews the code line by line, checking for logical consistency and adherence to the requirements specified in the design document.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Identification of Issues</strong>:<ul><li>QA engineer identifies a section of the code that could lead to a race condition where two discounts are applied simultaneously in a way that exceeds the total cart value.</li><li>BA’s acknowledge the oversight and discuss possible solutions with developers.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Resolution and Action Items:</strong><ul><li>The team agrees on a strategy to modify the code to handle exceptions more gracefully, including adding additional checks for discount combinations that are not allowed.</li><li>Developer takes notes on all feedback and agrees to revise the code accordingly. They schedule a follow-up session for the team to review the changes.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Documentation and Follow-up</strong>:<ul><li>QA engineer documents the findings and the agreed-upon action items in the project&#8217;s issue tracking system.</li><li>Project manager updates the project timeline to include additional time for re-testing the updated feature.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Code Revision and Re-check</strong>:<ul><li>Developer revises the code, incorporating all feedback. Once the updates are made, he invites the team for a second desk check.</li><li>The team reviews the revised code, confirming that all previously identified issues have been resolved effectively.</li></ul></li><li><strong>Final Approval and Move to Testing:</strong><ul><li>QA engineer prepares to conduct <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/formal-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">formal testing</a>, including both automated and manual test cases, to ensure the feature works as expected under various scenarios.</li></ul></li></ul>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Stay up to date with such resourceful blogs</p>
<p class="description">Subscribe to our monthly newsletter</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/newsletter/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener"> Join our QA Community</a>
</div>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>Desk checking is a fundamental practice in the testing strategy of any software development project. It not only helps in identifying and fixing errors early but also promotes a deeper understanding of the code among team members. By adhering to best practices and being mindful of common pitfalls, teams can effectively leverage desk checking to enhance software quality and reduce development time and costs. As technology evolves, the principles of desk checking remain relevant, underscoring its importance in achieving high-quality software products.</p>


Desk Checking: How it can be useful for testers


<p>Flaky tests, characterized by their unpredictable and intermittent nature, present a significant obstacle in the realm of software testing. These tests, which exhibit inconsistent behavior across test runs, can erode confidence in test results, disrupt development workflows, and hinder the delivery of high-quality software products.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In this case study, we delve into the journey of testing one of my customer’s products, as they grapple with the complexities of testing flaky tests and devise innovative strategies to mitigate their impact. Through their experiences, we aim to uncover valuable insights and best practices for addressing flakiness in software testing.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Background"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Background:</a></li><li><a href="#Challenges"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Challenges:</a></li><li><a href="#Solution"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Solution:</a></li><li><a href="#Results"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Results:</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Conclusion:</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-background"><span id="Background">Background:</span></h2>



<p>Let’s name the customer as company Y. The company operates in a fast-paced and dynamic environment, developing cutting-edge software solutions for a diverse clientele. As part of their rigorous quality assurance processes, the company relies heavily on automated testing frameworks to validate the functionality and reliability of their software products. However, despite their best efforts, Company Y encountered persistent challenges related to flaky tests.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/flaky-test/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">flaky tests</a>, which exhibited sporadic failures across different test runs, posed a significant impediment to the effectiveness of their testing efforts. Flakiness not only introduced uncertainty and unpredictability into the testing process but also consumed valuable time and resources as testers struggled to discern genuine failures from transient anomalies. Moreover, the elusive nature of flakiness made it challenging for Company Y to identify and address the root causes effectively, exacerbating the problem and leading to delays in software releases.</p>



<h2 id="challenges"><span id="Challenges">Challenges:</span></h2>



<p>The challenges faced by Company Y were multifaceted and profound.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li><strong>Inconsistency</strong>: Flaky tests exhibit unpredictable behavior, causing them to pass or fail intermittently across different test runs. This inconsistency undermines the reliability of test results, making it challenging for testers to discern genuine defects from transient anomalies.</li><li><strong><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/false-positive-and-false-negative/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">False Positives and Negatives</a></strong>: Flaky tests often produce false positives and false negatives, further complicating the testing process. False positives, where a test erroneously fails, can lead to unnecessary investigation and debugging efforts, wasting valuable time and resources. Conversely, false negatives, where a test erroneously passes, can mask underlying defects, allowing them to go undetected and potentially manifest in production environments.</li><li><strong>Time and Resource Consumption</strong>: Dealing with flaky tests consumes valuable time and resources, diverting attention away from productive testing activities. Testers spend significant effort investigating and re-running tests to determine the root causes of flakiness, delaying testing cycles and impeding progress.</li><li><strong>Difficulty in Reproduction</strong>: Flaky tests are notoriously difficult to reproduce consistently, as their behavior may be influenced by various factors such as timing, concurrency, or environmental conditions. This makes it challenging for testers to isolate and diagnose the underlying causes of flakiness, hindering effective resolution.</li><li><strong>Erosion of Trust</strong>: The presence of flaky tests erodes trust in the testing process and undermines confidence in test results. Stakeholders may become skeptical of test outcomes, leading to decreased faith in the reliability of the software being tested.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Impact on Release Timelines</strong>: Flaky tests can disrupt release timelines, causing delays in software delivery and impeding the achievement of project milestones. <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-failure-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test failures</a> due to flakiness may trigger unnecessary rework and regression testing, prolonging the testing phase and delaying product releases.</li></ul>



<p>As a result, Company Y faced mounting pressure to devise effective strategies for identifying, managing, and mitigating flakiness in their testing efforts.</p>



<h2 id="solution"><span id="Solution">Solution:</span></h2>



<p>In response to these challenges, Company Y embarked on a systematic approach to tackle flaky tests:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Test Environment Isolation</strong>: One solution to tackle flaky tests is to isolate test environments from external dependencies and fluctuations. By creating stable and controlled environments for testing, organizations can minimize the impact of external factors such as network latency, system load, and infrastructure changes on test results.</li><li><strong>Retry Mechanisms</strong>: Implementing robust retry mechanisms can help mitigate the impact of transient failures in flaky tests. By automatically retrying failed tests a predetermined number of times, organizations can increase the likelihood of obtaining consistent and reliable test results, reducing false positives and negatives.</li><li><strong>Test Data Management</strong>: Effective test data management is essential for addressing flaky tests caused by data variability. By ensuring consistent and standardized test data across test runs, organizations can minimize the likelihood of test failures due to data-related issues, such as missing or corrupt data.</li><li><strong>Test Case Prioritization</strong>: Prioritizing test cases based on their criticality and frequency of flakiness can help organizations focus their efforts on the most impactful areas. By identifying and prioritizing high-risk test cases prone to flakiness, testers can allocate resources more effectively and address flakiness where it matters most.</li><li><strong>Root Cause Analysis</strong>: Conducting <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_cause_analysis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">root cause analysis</a> is crucial for identifying and addressing the underlying causes of flakiness. By systematically investigating failed tests and analyzing their patterns and trends, organizations can pinpoint the root causes of flakiness and implement targeted solutions to mitigate them.</li><li><strong>Continuous Monitoring</strong>: Continuous monitoring of test results and performance metrics can provide valuable insights into the prevalence and impact of flaky tests. By monitoring test execution trends over time, organizations can identify patterns of flakiness and proactively address emerging issues before they escalate.</li></ul>



<h2 id="results"><span id="Results">Results:</span></h2>



<p>The efforts of Company Y yielded significant improvements in their testing processes:</p>



<ol><li><strong>Reduction in Flakiness</strong>: Through targeted analysis and refinement, Company Y successfully reduced the incidence of flaky tests by 50%, enhancing the reliability of their testing efforts.</li><li><strong>Increased Productivity</strong>: Automation and monitoring enabled Company Y to streamline their testing processes, freeing up valuable time for testers to focus on higher-value tasks and innovation.</li><li><strong>Improved Software Quality</strong>: With fewer flaky tests and more reliable test results, Company Y achieved higher software quality and increased confidence in their releases, leading to greater customer satisfaction.</li></ol>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion:</span></h2>



<p>In conclusion, the case of Company Y demonstrates the importance of proactive strategies and systematic approaches in tackling flaky tests. By conducting comprehensive analysis, prioritizing refinement efforts, and leveraging automation and monitoring tools, organizations can mitigate the impact of flakiness and deliver higher-quality software products. As testers, let&#8217;s draw inspiration from Company Y&#8217;s journey and continue to innovate and refine our testing practices in the ever-evolving landscape of software development.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Keep your flaky tests to a minimum with Testsigma </p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Check out Testsigma</a>
</div>


Software Testing Case Study on Flaky Tests


<p>As the software is becoming more and more complex in design, a need for efficient testing has become very crucial in the software development lifecycle. It helps identify and address defects early on, preventing issues from reaching the production stage.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Faster testing is often achieved through automation, parallelization, prioritization of test cases, and integration with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. By adopting these practices, development teams can achieve quicker turnaround times, improve agility, and deliver software with increased speed without sacrificing quality.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Faster_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is Faster Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Examples_of_Faster_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Examples of Faster Testing.</a></li><li><a href="#How_fast_should_tests_be"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> How fast should tests be?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_do_Faster_Testing_and_Maintain_Quality"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> How to do Faster Testing and Maintain Quality?</a><ul><li><a href="#1_Optimize_the_CICD_Pipeline"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.1</span>  ‍1. Optimize the CI/CD Pipeline</a></li><li><a href="#2_Start_Tracking_Bugs_Earlynbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.2</span>  ‍2. Start Tracking Bugs Early&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#3_Implement_Parallel_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.3</span>  ‍3. Implement Parallel Testing</a></li><li><a href="#4_Get_the_Testing_Process_Organized"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.4</span>  ‍4. Get the Testing Process Organized</a></li><li><a href="#5_Balance_Manual_and_Automation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.5</span>  ‍5. Balance Manual and Automation Testing</a></li><li><a href="#6_Reduce_Flakiness_in_the_QA_Process"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.6</span>  ‍6. Reduce Flakiness in the QA Process</a></li><li><a href="#7_Test_on_Real_Devices"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.7</span>  ‍7. Test on Real Devices</a></li><li><a href="#8_Use_Container_Approach_to_Get_Fast_Feedback"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.8</span>  ‍‍8. Use Container Approach to Get Fast Feedback</a></li><li><a href="#9_Implement_Continuous_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.9</span>  ‍‍9. Implement Continuous Testing</a></li><li><a href="#10_Keep_Communication_Transparent"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">4.10</span>  ‍10. Keep Communication Transparent</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#How_Does_Testsigma_Help_Organizations_for_Faster_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> How Does Testsigma Help Organizations for Faster Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Which_is_a_better_way_of_testing_in_a_quicker_time"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.1</span> Which is a better way of testing in a quicker time?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="what-is-faster-testing"><span id="What_is_Faster_Testing"><strong>What is Faster Testing?</strong></span></h2>



<p>&#8220;Faster testing&#8221; refers to the practice of optimizing and expediting the software testing process. It involves implementing strategies, tools, and methodologies to reduce the time required for various testing activities without compromising the quality of the software. The goal is to accelerate the testing lifecycle to provide quicker feedback on the software&#8217;s functionality, performance, and reliability.</p>



<h2 id="examples-of-faster-testing"><span id="Examples_of_Faster_Testing"><strong>Examples of Faster Testing.</strong></span></h2>



<p>There are various ways to achieve this. Some very common examples are listed below.</p>



<ul><li>Writing and executing <strong>automated test scripts </strong>significantly speeds up the testing process. Automation allows for the rapid and repetitive execution of test cases, freeing up manual testing resources for more complex scenarios. Though test automation tools, in general, make your testing process faster, low-code test automation tools make your testing more efficient and faster than tools that support only script-based testing.&nbsp;</li></ul>



<p><strong>Example &#8211;</strong> Let me give an instance: Selenium vs Testsigma, though both are among the best test automation tools in the market, the pace of testing varies in accordance with manual effort, technical skills, time, ease of use, etc. Testsigma makes your testing 10x faster with test automation support like NLPs, Record features, and custom coding support.</p>



<p>On the other hand, Selenium is a tool that supports script-based testing. And it would require extensive coding skills to create automated tests. This would require more time to create test scripts, and test reusability is also quite less when compared to a low-code testing tool.</p>



<p>So, if you&#8217;re looking to make your test automation faster with more quality, consider using a low-code platform.</p>



<p><br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Learn more about automation testing here</a></button></p><br></p>



<ul><li><strong>Running tests in parallel </strong>on multiple devices or environments helps identify issues concurrently, reducing the overall testing time. <a href="https://testsigma.com/parallel-test-runs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Parallel testing</a> is particularly useful for cross-browser or cross-platform testing.</li><li><strong>Integrating testing into the CI process </strong>allows for automatic testing with each code commit. This ensures that defects are detected early in the development cycle, minimizing the time between identifying and fixing issues.</li><li><strong>Shifting testing activities earlier in the development process</strong>, such as during the requirements or design phase, helps catch and address issues at their inception, preventing them from progressing through later stages.</li></ul>



<h2 id="how-fast-should-tests-be"><span id="How_fast_should_tests_be"><strong>How fast should tests be?</strong></span></h2>



<p>The speed of tests is a critical aspect of an efficient software development process. Tests should strike a balance between being fast enough to provide rapid feedback to developers, especially in continuous integration and deployment environments, and comprehensive enough to ensure the robustness of the codebase. Unit tests, designed to run quickly and frequently, should be swift to catch issues early in the development cycle. However, the speed of tests should not compromise their realism or depth, as a thoughtful combination of fast unit tests and more comprehensive integration and end-to-end tests contributes to a well-rounded testing strategy. Ultimately, the optimal speed of tests is contextual, influenced by the project&#8217;s requirements, testing environment, and the need for timely and accurate feedback.</p>



<h2 id="how-to-do-faster-testing-and-maintain-quality"><span id="How_to_do_Faster_Testing_and_Maintain_Quality"><strong>How to do Faster Testing and Maintain Quality?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Achieving faster testing while maintaining quality involves leveraging automation for repetitive tasks and prioritizing test scenarios based on critical functionalities. Implementing parallelization and continuous integration practices further streamline the testing process, ensuring efficient feedback without compromising the thoroughness of quality assurance.</p>



<h3 id="1-optimize-the-ci-cd-pipeline"><span id="1_Optimize_the_CICD_Pipeline"><strong> ‍1. Optimize the CI/CD Pipeline</strong></span></h3>



<p>Optimizing the Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline contributes to faster testing by automating the build, test, and deployment processes. Efficient CI/CD pipelines enable rapid feedback loops, automatically triggering tests upon code changes, identifying issues early in the development cycle, and facilitating quicker releases. Additionally, parallelization within the pipeline allows for simultaneous execution of tests, significantly reducing the overall testing time and enhancing the speed of software delivery while maintaining a focus on quality</p>



<h3 id="2-start-tracking-bugs-early"><span id="2_Start_Tracking_Bugs_Earlynbsp"><strong> ‍2. Start Tracking Bugs Early&nbsp;</strong></span></h3>



<p>Starting to track bugs early in the development process accelerates testing by identifying and addressing issues at their inception. Early bug tracking allows for immediate resolution, preventing the accumulation of complex and interconnected problems later in the development cycle. This proactive approach reduces the time spent on debugging during later testing phases, streamlining the overall testing process and promoting a faster and more efficient software development lifecycle.</p>



<h3 id="3-implement-parallel-testing"><span id="3_Implement_Parallel_Testing"><strong> ‍3. Implement Parallel Testing</strong></span></h3>



<p>Execute tests concurrently or in parallel to save time. This can be achieved by running tests on multiple machines or using parallel testing frameworks.</p>



<h3 id="4-get-the-testing-process-organized"><span id="4_Get_the_Testing_Process_Organized"><strong> ‍4. Get the Testing Process Organized</strong></span></h3>



<p>it is essential to establish a structured and documented testing process. Begin by defining clear objectives and scope, creating a detailed test plan, and documenting comprehensive test cases and scripts. Efficient test data management and streamlined test environment setups contribute to organized testing efforts.</p>



<h3 id="5-balance-manual-and-automation-testing"><span id="5_Balance_Manual_and_Automation_Testing"><strong> ‍5. Balance Manual and Automation Testing</strong></span></h3>



<p>Balancing manual and automation testing is crucial for <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-optimization/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">optimizing the testing process</a>. Manual testing provides a human perspective, intuition, and adaptability, while automation testing offers speed, repeatability, and efficiency. Striking the right balance ensures that the strengths of both approaches are leveraged effectively.</p>



<p><a href="https://testsigma.com/qa-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test automation tools</a> like Testsigma make your test automation process 10x faster, thereby helping you ship products at an 8x faster rate. This saves a lot of time, resources, effort, and cost.</p>



<h3 id="6-reduce-flakiness-in-the-qa-process"><span id="6_Reduce_Flakiness_in_the_QA_Process"><strong> ‍6. Reduce Flakiness in the QA Process</strong></span></h3>



<p>Reducing flakiness in testing is crucial for achieving reliable and efficient test automation. Flaky tests are tests that produce inconsistent results, often leading to false positives or negatives. A stable and consistent test environment, coupled with dynamic wait strategies and robust locator mechanisms, helps address common causes of flakiness</p>



<h3 id="7-test-on-real-devices"><span id="7_Test_on_Real_Devices"><strong> ‍7. Test on Real Devices</strong></span></h3>



<p>Real devices provide a more authentic representation of user interactions, allowing testers to identify device-specific issues that might go unnoticed in simulated environments. This approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation of the application&#8217;s performance across various devices, operating systems, and network conditions, leading to a more robust and reliable product.</p>



<h3 id="8-use-container-approach-to-get-fast-feedback"><span id="8_Use_Container_Approach_to_Get_Fast_Feedback"><strong> ‍‍8. Use Container Approach to Get Fast Feedback</strong></span></h3>



<p>The containerization of applications enhances collaboration between development and testing teams, as they can share the same containerized environment, minimizing discrepancies between testing and production environments. The result is faster and more reliable feedback on the application&#8217;s functionality, performance, and compatibility, enabling teams to identify and address issues promptly in the development lifecycle.</p>



<h3 id="9-implement-continuous-testing"><span id="9_Implement_Continuous_Testing"><strong> ‍‍9. Implement Continuous Testing</strong></span></h3>



<p><a href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous testing</a> involves the seamless integration of automated tests into the continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. By automating the execution of tests at various stages of development, from unit testing to acceptance testing, teams can obtain immediate feedback on code changes. This not only accelerates the identification of defects but also ensures that new functionalities do not compromise existing features</p>



<h3 id="10-keep-communication-transparent"><span id="10_Keep_Communication_Transparent"><strong> ‍10. Keep Communication Transparent</strong></span></h3>



<p>Foster collaboration between development, testing, and operations teams. Effective communication helps in resolving issues faster and ensures that everyone is aligned with the project goals. Maintaining transparent communication within the testing team and across development fosters a collaborative environment. Swift issue resolution, effective collaboration, and shared insights accelerate testing cycles, ensuring faster and more efficient software delivery.</p>



<h2 id="how-does-testsigma-help-organizations-for-faster-testing"><span id="How_Does_Testsigma_Help_Organizations_for_Faster_Testing"><strong>How Does Testsigma Help Organizations for Faster Testing?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Testsigma is a robust, low-code, cloud-based AI-driven test automation tool that supports scriptless test automation for web, mobile, desktop, and API tests in a single platform.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It makes your test automation 10x faster, allowing you to ship products at an 8x faster rate. This significantly reduces the time, cost, effort, and resources required for testing.</p>



<p>Using Testsigma, testers can create and execute automated tests using plain English statements as it supports NLPs. Also, it offers a <strong>Record</strong> feature where testers can record user interactions and run them as automated tests on the cloud.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It also supports the creation of code-based test scripts using Java for certain scenarios that might require coding. This makes testing accessible for everyone in the team and requires less manual effort, cost, time, and resources, and less to no coding skills.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Below is an image of how test case creation and execution will look when you automate tests with Testsigma.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/oQ8Qv9V7NjuOhAfImmrHIR7LsMxqMfe_zQQC5pmdCvC81jicbG85druJWoJPMyjeiCC1pqvyFIw4IUz3NrPXRulq1NBxrP4LkOs3TCTlvdTYGP9qDZVV18-xTovgTfJRN0YgO1hCsjgzy5XgHJJzMY4VEUMBWBe6SCI223pKXQjjjry5zRMvxH3xJbuAIA" alt="Faster testing with Testsigma"/></figure></div>



<p><br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Learn more about automating your tests with Testsigma</a></button></p><br></p>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>To expedite testing processes employ strategies such as test automation, parallel testing, and continuous integration. Prioritize critical tests, manage test data efficiently, and use cloud testing services. Implementing these practices ensures a streamlined testing pipeline, delivering faster and more high-quality results throughout the software development lifecycle.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-which-is-a-better-way-of-testing-in-a-quicker-time"><span id="Which_is_a_better_way_of_testing_in_a_quicker_time"><strong>Which is a better way of testing in a quicker time?</strong></span></h3>



<p>The most effective way to achieve quicker testing depends on the context, project requirements, and available resources. However, a combination of automated testing, continuous integration, and parallel testing is often considered a powerful approach for faster and more efficient testing. Automated testing reduces manual effort and accelerates repetitive tasks, continuous integration ensures that tests are run consistently with each code change, and parallel testing enables the execution of multiple tests simultaneously, further reducing testing time. Additionally, prioritizing tests based on critical functionalities and implementing a robust test data management strategy contributes to faster testing cycles. It&#8217;s essential to tailor the testing approach to the specific needs and constraints of the project.</p>


Faster Testing 10 Ways To Speed Up Testing

Faster Testing | 10 Ways To Speed Up Testing


<p>A test condition in software testing refers to a specific element or aspect of a software application that is examined to determine whether it functions correctly or meets specified requirements. Test conditions are part of the overall test case design and are used to guide the testing process. They are created based on the software&#8217;s functional and nonfunctional requirements, design specifications, and other relevant documentation.&nbsp;</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_a_Test_Condition"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is a Test Condition?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_an_example_of_a_test_condition_in_software"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> What is an example of a test condition in software?</a></li><li><a href="#Factors_that_determine_the_level_of_detail_of_the_Test_Condition"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Factors that determine the level of detail of the Test Condition</a></li><li><a href="#How_do_you_write_a_test_condition"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> How do you write a test condition?</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_describing_test_conditions_in_a_detailed_manner"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Advantages of describing test conditions in a detailed manner</a></li><li><a href="#Disadvantages_of_describing_test_conditions_in_a_detailed_manner"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Disadvantages of describing test conditions in a detailed manner</a></li><li><a href="#When_to_describe_test_conditions_in_great_detail"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> When to describe test conditions in great detail?</a></li><li><a href="#When_to_describe_test_conditions_in_less_detail"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">8</span> When to describe test conditions in less detail?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">9</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">10</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_test_condition_and_test_item"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">10.1</span> What is the difference between test condition and test item?</a></li><li><a href="#What8217s_the_Difference_between_Test_Condition_vs_test_Scenario"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">10.2</span> What&#8217;s the Difference between Test Condition vs. test Scenario ?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="what-is-a-test-condition"><span id="What_is_a_Test_Condition"><strong>What is a Test Condition?</strong></span></h2>



<p>In software testing, a test condition is a specification that a tester must adhere to when testing a software program. For test cases, a test condition is a collection of restrictions that might include features such as transactions, functions, or structural aspects in order to test the software application</p>



<h2 id="what-is-an-example-of-a-test-condition-in-software"><span id="What_is_an_example_of_a_test_condition_in_software"><strong>What is an example of a test condition in software?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Test conditions are very specific in nature. E.g. “The application will move forward ONLY when the login name and the password are correct”</p>



<h2 id="factors-that-determine-the-level-of-detail-of-the-test-condition"><span id="Factors_that_determine_the_level_of_detail_of_the_Test_Condition"><strong>Factors that determine the level of detail of the Test Condition</strong></span></h2>



<p>The level of detail for test conditions in software testing can vary depending on several factors. The decision on how detailed a test condition should be is influenced by the following considerations:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Complexity of the Software</strong>: More complex software often requires more detailed and granular test conditions to ensure that all aspects and interactions are thoroughly tested.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Requirements Clarity</strong>: If the requirements are well-documented and clearly define the expected behavior, it&#8217;s easier to create detailed test conditions.</li><li><strong>Criticality of Functionality</strong>: Core or mission-critical functions often require more detailed test conditions to ensure their reliability and accuracy.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Risk Assessment</strong>: High-risk areas may require more detailed testing to mitigate potential issues, while lower-risk areas may have less detailed test conditions.</li><li><strong>Time and Resource Constraints</strong>: In situations with tight schedules, it may be necessary to create less detailed test conditions to expedite the testing process.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Reusability</strong>: If a set of test conditions can be applied to multiple test cases or scenarios, it might be beneficial to create more detailed conditions for wider applicability.</li><li><strong>Tooling and Automation</strong>: Automated testing can handle more granular test conditions efficiently, which may lead to creating more detailed test cases.</li></ul>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p>Automated Testing can help you save tonnes of testing time.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Learn More</a>
</div>



<h2 id="how-do-you-write-a-test-condition"><span id="How_do_you_write_a_test_condition"><strong>How do you write a test condition?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Test conditions are used to create <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases</a>, so this information serves as a foundation for test case design.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Step 1: Write the condition</p>



<p>Step 2: Identify the inputs</p>



<p>Step 3: Identify pre-conditions</p>



<p>Step 4: Expected Results</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s an example of a test condition for login functionality:</p>



<ul><li>Test Condition: User login with valid credentials&nbsp;</li><li>Inputs:</li></ul>



<p>Username: [valid username]</p>



<p>Password: [valid password]</p>



<ul><li>Preconditions:</li></ul>



<p>The login page is accessible</p>



<ul><li>Expected Results:</li></ul>



<p>The user is successfully logged into the system, and they are redirected to the dashboard.</p>



<h2 id="advantages-of-describing-test-conditions-in-a-detailed-manner"><span id="Advantages_of_describing_test_conditions_in_a_detailed_manner"><strong>Advantages of describing test conditions in a detailed manner</strong></span></h2>



<p>Describing test conditions in detail is essential in software testing because it enhances the clarity, precision, and effectiveness of the testing process.&nbsp;</p>



<ol><li>Detailed test conditions provide a comprehensive and unambiguous roadmap for testers, clearly defining what needs to be tested, how to test it, and what constitutes success or failure.&nbsp;</li><li>This level of granularity reduces ambiguity, promotes consistency among testers, and leaves less room for interpretation, ensuring that all team members have a shared understanding of the testing objectives.</li><li>Detailed test conditions lead to improved test coverage by addressing various aspects and edge cases of the software, which, in turn, enhances the likelihood of identifying defects and errors.&nbsp;</li><li>This detailed documentation also serves as a valuable reference for regression testing, audit compliance, troubleshooting, and future test automation efforts, ultimately contributing to the overall quality and reliability of the software.</li></ol>



<h2 id="disadvantages-of-describing-test-conditions-in-a-detailed-manner"><span id="Disadvantages_of_describing_test_conditions_in_a_detailed_manner"><strong>Disadvantages of describing test conditions in a detailed manner</strong></span></h2>



<p>While describing test conditions in detail offers many advantages, there are also some potential disadvantages to consider.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>One key drawback is the time and effort required to create highly detailed test conditions. This can be resource-intensive, particularly in complex software projects, and may slow down the testing process.&nbsp;</li><li>Overly detailed test conditions can make the documentation lengthy and complex, potentially overwhelming testers with information.&nbsp;</li><li>Testers might also become overly rigid in following the prescribed conditions, potentially missing out on exploratory testing and creative problem-solving.</li><li>Maintaining and updating highly detailed test conditions as the software evolves can be a significant challenge.&nbsp;</li><li>Striking the right balance between detail and efficiency is crucial, as excessively detailed conditions can lead to diminishing returns and unnecessary complexity in the testing process.</li></ul>



<h2 id="when-to-describe-test-conditions-in-great-detail"><span id="When_to_describe_test_conditions_in_great_detail"><strong>When to describe test conditions in great detail?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Describing test conditions in great detail is particularly beneficial in specific testing scenarios.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>When testing critical or mission-critical functionalities, it is essential to have highly detailed test conditions to ensure their accuracy, reliability, and security.&nbsp;</li><li>In industries with stringent regulatory requirements, such as healthcare or finance, detailed test conditions are necessary to demonstrate compliance.&nbsp;</li><li>When testing software with a history of frequent defects or areas prone to issues, detailed conditions can help uncover hidden problems. High-risk components, or those where a single failure could have serious consequences, also warrant detailed testing conditions.&nbsp;</li><li>In the early stages of a software development project, detailed test conditions can help identify potential issues before they become more costly to fix, making them invaluable for prevention and early detection.</li></ul>



<h2 id="when-to-describe-test-conditions-in-less-detail"><span id="When_to_describe_test_conditions_in_less_detail"><strong>When to describe test conditions in less detail?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Describing test conditions in less detail may be appropriate in certain situations.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>When working with well-established and stable software components or mature systems that have a history of consistent performance, less detailed conditions can expedite testing without compromising quality.&nbsp;</li><li>In agile or fast-paced development environments, where frequent changes and updates occur, focusing on high-level, broad test conditions can ensure testing keeps pace with development efforts.</li><li>During exploratory testing or usability testing, less detailed conditions can encourage testers to approach the software from a more open and creative perspective, allowing them to identify unforeseen issues and user experience concerns.&nbsp;</li></ul>



<p>Striking a balance between detailed and less detailed test conditions is essential, as over-specifying conditions can lead to unnecessary effort and slow down the testing process.</p>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>In summary, a test condition is a fundamental concept in <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a> that enables testers to systematically evaluate and verify specific aspects of a software application to ensure its quality and reliability. It plays a crucial role in the overall testing process and contributes to the identification and resolution of defects and issues in the software.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="what-is-the-difference-between-test-condition-and-test-item"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_test_condition_and_test_item"><strong>What is the difference between test condition and test item?</strong></span></h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Test Condition</td><td>Test Item</td></tr><tr><td>A test condition is a specific aspect or element of the software under test that is being examined during the testing process. It defines what needs to be tested and the expected outcomes.</td><td>A test item refers to the entire software application or a specific component or module that is being tested as a whole. It represents the software or part of it that is the subject of the testing effort.</td></tr><tr><td>Test conditions help in specifying what aspects of the software will be tested and what criteria should be met for the test to be considered successful.</td><td>Test items are the entities that you are testing. They can be a complete software system, a software module, or even individual features or functionalities.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Example</strong>: In testing a banking application, a test condition could be to verify the functionality of transferring funds between two accounts to ensure that the correct amount is deducted from one account and added to the other, and that the user receives a confirmation message.</td><td><strong>Example</strong>: If you&#8217;re testing a complete e-commerce website, the entire website, including the user interface, shopping cart, payment gateway, and database integration, is the test item. However, you can also have test items at a smaller scale, such as testing just the login module within that website.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 id="h-what-s-the-difference-between-test-condition-vs-test-scenario"><span id="What8217s_the_Difference_between_Test_Condition_vs_test_Scenario">What&#8217;s the Difference between Test Condition vs. test Scenario ?</span></h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Test Condition</td><td>Test Scenario</td></tr><tr><td>A test condition is a specific, detailed element or aspect of the software that is being evaluated in testing. It specifies what needs to be tested, including inputs, expected results, and conditions.</td><td>A test scenario is a broader, high-level description of a testing situation that encompasses multiple test conditions and simulates a real-world use case or user interaction.</td></tr><tr><td>Test conditions are more granular and specific, focusing on individual features, functions, or aspects of the software.</td><td>Test scenarios are less granular and describe a sequence of activities or a complete end-to-end process, often combining multiple test conditions.</td></tr><tr><td>The purpose of test conditions is to examine and validate the detailed functionality or attributes of the software, typically in isolation.</td><td>Test scenarios are designed to assess the software&#8217;s behavior in real-world contexts, considering how various features and components work together to achieve a specific user goal</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Example</strong>: In a travel booking website, a test condition could focus on validating the functionality of the &#8220;search&#8221; button, ensuring that it returns accurate results when a user enters specific travel dates and destinations.</td><td><strong>Example</strong>: A test scenario for the same travel booking website might involve a complete booking process, including multiple test conditions like searching for flights, selecting a flight, entering passenger information, making a payment, and receiving a booking confirmation.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>


What is a Test Condition in Software Testing

What is a Test Condition in Software Testing?


<p>To deliver software products that meet high standards of quality and reliability, software testing and quality assurance are being used as integral components of the software development process. Often, people interchange their names for the same meaning, but they both have some differences too. </p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Software_Testing_VS_Quality_Assurance_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Software Testing VS Quality Assurance &#8211; Overview</a></li><li><a href="#Differences_Between_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Differences Between Software Testing and Quality Assurance</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Advantages of Software Testing and Quality Assurance</a></li><li><a href="#Limitations_of_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Limitations of Software Testing and Quality Assurance</a></li><li><a href="#Testing_VS_Quality_Assurance_8211_How_can_Testing_Help_Make_Your_Product_Better"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Testing VS Quality Assurance &#8211; How can Testing Help Make Your Product Better?</a></li><li><a href="#Summary"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_SQA_and_software_testing_same"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.1</span> Is SQA and software testing same?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="software-testing-vs-quality-assurance-overview"><span id="Software_Testing_VS_Quality_Assurance_8211_Overview"><strong>Software Testing VS Quality Assurance &#8211; Overview</strong></span></h2>



<p><strong>Software testing</strong> involves the systematic process of evaluating a software application to identify defects or inconsistencies, ensuring that it functions as intended and meets user requirements. Testers meticulously design test cases, execute them, and report any discovered defects, ultimately striving to enhance the software&#8217;s robustness. </p>



<p><strong>Quality assurance</strong>, on the other hand, is a comprehensive approach that goes beyond testing. It encompasses the establishment of quality standards, process improvement initiatives, and adherence to best practices throughout the development lifecycle. Quality assurance aims to prevent defects from occurring in the first place, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and ensuring that software development processes are efficient, effective, and aligned with organizational goals. Together, software testing and quality assurance foster confidence in software products, promoting customer satisfaction and long-term success in the ever-evolving world of technology.</p>



<h2 id="h-differences-between-software-testing-and-quality-assurance"><span id="Differences_Between_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><strong>Differences Between Software Testing and Quality Assurance</strong></span></h2>



<p>They both play critical roles in ensuring the delivery of high-quality software, but they have different objectives, focuses, and methods. Here are the key differences between <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a> and <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/quality-assurance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">quality assurance</a>:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Criteria</td><td>Software Testing</td><td>Quality Assurance</td></tr><tr><td>Objective</td><td>The primary objective of software testing is to identify defects or bugs in the software.<br><br>Testing is a dynamic process where testers actively execute the software to find issues such as functionality errors, performance problems, security vulnerabilities, and usability issues</td><td>Quality assurance is a broader process that focuses on ensuring that the entire software development process is carried out correctly.<br><br>It aims to prevent defects from occurring in the first place by implementing best practices, processes, and standards</td></tr><tr><td>Timing</td><td>Testing is typically carried out after the software has been developed. It is a validation process that confirms whether the software meets the specified requirements.</td><td>Quality assurance starts at the beginning of the software development process and continues throughout the entire lifecycle. It encompasses activities like process audits, standards enforcement, and training to improve the development process itself.</td></tr><tr><td>Responsibility</td><td>Testers are responsible for conducting testing activities. They execute test cases, report defects, and ensure that the software functions as expected.</td><td>Quality assurance is the responsibility of the entire development team and often involves quality assurance professionals, process experts, and project managers. It requires a collaborative effort to improve processes and maintain quality standards.</td></tr><tr><td>Deliverables</td><td>The primary deliverables of testing are test plans, test cases, test reports, and defect logs. These artifacts provide information about the software&#8217;s quality and reliability.</td><td>Quality assurance delivers process documentation, standards, guidelines, and process improvement recommendations. It ensures that the development process itself is robust and efficient.</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term vs. Short-term</td><td>Testing is more focused on short-term goals, such as identifying and fixing defects in the current software release.</td><td>Quality assurance has a long-term focus, aiming to improve processes and prevent defects in future software projects.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-advantages-of-software-testing-and-quality-assurance"><span id="Advantages_of_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><strong>Advantages of Software Testing and Quality Assurance</strong></span></h2>



<p>Software testing and quality assurance offer numerous advantages throughout the software development lifecycle. Here are some key benefits of these processes:</p>



<p><strong>Advantages of Software Testing:</strong></p>



<ul><li><strong>Bugs Detection</strong>: Testing helps identify and rectify defects and bugs in the software, ensuring that it functions correctly and meets user expectations.</li><li><strong>Improved Reliability</strong>: Thorough testing enhances the reliability and stability of the software, reducing the likelihood of unexpected failures and crashes.</li><li><strong>Enhanced Security</strong>: Security testing helps identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the software, allowing for timely security fixes to protect against threats and data breaches.</li><li><strong>Better User Experience</strong>: Testing ensures that the software is user-friendly, intuitive, and provides a positive user experience, which is essential for customer satisfaction.</li><li><strong>Performance Optimization</strong>: Performance testing identifies bottlenecks and performance issues, enabling optimization for faster response times and resource efficiency.</li><li><strong>Cost Savings</strong>: Detecting and fixing defects early in the development process is more cost-effective than addressing issues in production, where the cost and impact of defects are much higher.</li><li><strong>Compliance</strong>: Testing helps ensure that the software complies with industry-specific regulations, standards, and legal requirements.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Advantages of Quality Assurance:</strong></p>



<ul><li><strong>Process Improvement</strong>: Quality assurance focuses on optimizing development processes, leading to more efficient and effective workflows, reducing waste, and improving productivity.</li><li><strong>Consistency</strong>: QA practices promote consistency in software development, ensuring that all team members adhere to best practices and standards.</li><li><strong>Prevention of Defects</strong>: By implementing quality assurance measures, organizations can proactively prevent defects and errors from occurring, reducing the need for extensive testing and rework.</li><li><strong>Risk Mitigation</strong>: QA identifies risks and issues early, allowing for proactive risk mitigation strategies to be implemented.</li><li><strong>Customer Satisfaction</strong>: High-quality products delivered through quality assurance lead to increased customer satisfaction and loyalty.</li><li><strong>Competitive Advantage</strong>: Organizations that prioritize quality assurance often gain a competitive advantage by delivering more reliable and superior software products.</li><li><strong>Resource Efficiency</strong>: QA helps allocate resources more efficiently by focusing on areas that can deliver the most significant quality improvements.</li><li><strong>Data-Driven Decision Making</strong>: QA relies on data and metrics to make informed decisions about process improvements, allowing for continuous optimization.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-limitations-of-software-testing-and-quality-assurance"><span id="Limitations_of_Software_Testing_and_Quality_Assurance"><strong>Limitations of Software Testing and Quality Assurance</strong></span></h2>



<p>While software testing and quality assurance are essential processes in the software development lifecycle, they have their limitations and challenges. Here are some of the key limitations of software testing and quality assurance:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Incomplete Test Coverage</strong>: Testing may not cover every possible scenario, leading to the possibility of undiscovered defects. Achieving 100% test coverage is often impractical or impossible.</li><li><strong>Time and Resource Constraints</strong>: Limited time and resources can restrict the depth and breadth of testing. Comprehensive testing may be time-consuming and costly, leading to compromises in test coverage.</li><li><strong>False Sense of Security</strong>: Successful testing does not guarantee a defect-free software product. It can provide a false sense of security, leading to the release of software with hidden defects.</li><li><strong>Changing Requirements</strong>: As requirements evolve during the development process, it can be challenging to keep test cases and quality assurance measures aligned with the changing specifications.</li><li><strong>Human Error</strong>: Testers and quality assurance professionals can make mistakes, leading to missed defects or incorrect assessments of software quality.</li><li><strong>Subjectivity</strong>: Quality assurance measures may involve subjective judgments, and what is considered &#8220;high quality&#8221; can vary from person to person.</li><li><strong>Lack of Complete Security</strong>: While security testing can identify vulnerabilities, it cannot guarantee that the software is entirely secure. New security threats may emerge after testing is completed.</li><li><strong>Complex Interactions</strong>: In complex software systems, interactions between different components can be difficult to predict and test comprehensively, leading to unexpected issues.</li><li><strong>Limited Real-World Scenarios</strong>: Testing environments may not accurately replicate real-world usage conditions, leading to the possibility of defects emerging in production.</li><li><strong>Maintenance Overhead</strong>: Maintaining <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_case" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases</a> and quality assurance processes can be resource-intensive, particularly as software evolves and new features are added.</li><li><strong>Cost-Effectiveness</strong>: Achieving a high level of software quality through extensive testing and quality assurance measures can be costly, and organizations must strike a balance between quality and budget constraints.</li><li><strong>Ethical Considerations</strong>: Some testing and quality assurance activities, such as security testing or performance testing under heavy load, may involve ethical dilemmas or legal considerations.</li><li><strong>Diminished Returns</strong>: There comes a point of diminishing returns in testing, where the effort required to find and fix the remaining defects becomes disproportionately high.</li></ul>



<h2 id="testing-vs-quality-assurance-how-can-testing-help-make-your-product-better"><span id="Testing_VS_Quality_Assurance_8211_How_can_Testing_Help_Make_Your_Product_Better"><strong>Testing VS Quality Assurance</strong> &#8211; <strong>How can Testing Help Make Your Product Better?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Testing is a vital part of making sure a product works well. It helps ensure the product meets what it’s supposed to do and that there aren’t any problems before you use it. Testing can also give developers feedback on how people interact with the product, so they can make changes to make it better for you.</p>



<p>Testing is essential to ensure the product you’re working on will be great. It checks for all the possible outcomes of what you’re making and helps ensure it’s going to work how it’s supposed to. Testing should start immediately when you first think of an idea to determine if it’s feasible in the first place, what assumptions need to be made, and how best to test it. Without testing, there would be no way of knowing if your product works properly. The more testing you do early in the process, the more likely your product will be successful and make customers happy!</p>



<p>Finally, testing ensures the product is safe and secure, protecting users and developers from potential risks. Doing tests before releasing a product helps businesses ensure their products are of good quality and provide a good user experience.</p>



<h2 id="h-summary"><span id="Summary"><strong>Summary</strong></span></h2>



<p>In summary, software testing and quality assurance (QA) are two interconnected but distinct processes in the software development lifecycle: While Software Testing is a process that involves the systematic evaluation of a software application to identify and rectify defects or issues, Quality Assurance is a broader approach that encompasses the entire software development process. Together, these processes help ensure the delivery of high-quality software products that meet user expectations and industry standards.</p>



<p><br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Achieve better testing and quality assurance results by adopting a flexible and easy-to-use test automation tool Testsigma</a></button></p><br></p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions">Frequently Asked Questions</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-is-sqa-and-software-testing-same"><span id="Is_SQA_and_software_testing_same"><strong>Is SQA and software testing same?</strong></span></h3>



<p>No, <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/software-quality-assurance-plan/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Software Quality Assurance</a> (SQA) and software testing are not the same, although they are related concepts within the field of software development.</p>



<p>SQA is a broader and more encompassing concept that involves ensuring the quality of the entire software development process.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Software testing, on the other hand, is a specific subset of SQA. It is the process of systematically evaluating a software application to identify and rectify defects or issues in the software.</p>


Difference Between software testing and quality assurance

Difference Between Software Testing and Quality Assurance


<p>Test estimation techniques refer to the methods and approaches used to determine or estimate the effort, time, and resources required for testing activities in software development projects.</p>



<p><br>Estimating the testing effort is crucial for effective project planning, resource allocation, and scheduling.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Software_Test_Estimation"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is Software Test Estimation?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_Test_Estimation"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Why Test Estimation?</a></li><li><a href="#What_to_estimate"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> What to estimate?</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Estimation_Techniques"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Test Estimation Techniques</a></li><li><a href="#Test_estimation_best_practices"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Test estimation best practices</a></li><li><a href="#Software_Test_Estimation_Template"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Software Test Estimation Template</a></li><li><a href="#Summary"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Summary</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-software-test-estimation"><span id="What_is_Software_Test_Estimation"><strong>What is Software Test Estimation?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Software test estimation is a managerial task that involves assessing and approximating the required time, resources, and costs for executing tests in a specific environment. It serves as a projection that aids in preventing time constraints and exceeding budgets.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 id="why-test-estimation"><span id="Why_Test_Estimation"><strong>Why Test Estimation?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Test estimation is conducted for several important reasons:<br></p>



<ul><li><strong>Project Planning</strong>: With correct estimations done, the overall project timeline can be kept under check. Project managers can create realistic schedules and allocate resources as per need if they know the time required for testing activities well in advance. This allows for effective coordination with development and other project activities.<br></li><li><strong>Resource Allocation</strong>: With test estimations in place, the resource allocations: namely number of testers, testing tools, and testing environments required, can be allocated diligently and efficiently. It helps to ensure that overallocation or underutilization of resources is avoided.<br></li><li><strong>Budgeting and Cost Control</strong>: Budgets are crucial to any project’s success. Expenses like&nbsp; personnel costs, infrastructure costs, and tooling costs can be estimated well if testing efforts are estimated efficiently. By having a clear understanding of the expected costs, organizations can create accurate budgets, monitor expenses, and prevent cost overruns.<br></li><li><strong>Risk Management</strong>: Estimation can also help build visibility into any potential risks associated with testing including areas that may require additional attention or resources. This allows for risk mitigation strategies to be implemented proactively.<br></li><li><strong>Stakeholder Expectations</strong>: Estimation helps set realistic expectations with project stakeholders, including clients, managers, and development teams.</li></ul>



<ul><li><strong>Project Optimization</strong>: Accurate estimation allows for better planning and optimization of testing activities. It helps identify opportunities for process improvements, resource optimization, and automation, leading to increased efficiency and productivity in the testing process.</li></ul>



<h2 id="what-to-estimate"><span id="What_to_estimate"><strong>What to estimate?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Estimation techniques are employed to estimate various aspects of software development projects. These techniques are used to estimate the effort, time, resources, and costs associated with different project components.&nbsp;</p>



<ol><li>With estimation techniques, one can estimate the effort required for activities such as analysis, design, coding, testing, documentation, and project management.&nbsp;</li><li>They help in estimating the time required to complete the project or specific milestones, considering dependencies and constraints.</li><li>&nbsp;Estimation techniques also assist in estimating the resources needed, including team members, their skills, tools, and infrastructure.&nbsp;</li><li>Additionally, these techniques can be applied to estimate the complexity of features and functionalities, identify potential risks and uncertainties, and estimate the effort required for testing, documentation, and other project activities.&nbsp;</li></ol>



<h2 id="test-estimation-techniques"><span id="Test_Estimation_Techniques"><strong>Test Estimation Techniques</strong></span></h2>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/BY0yzT3-XFDJ3_wNH3Ty9iA-bduolGzmGa7JFylQvKO0rkpM0exl7E0gOQUVVUYaTWZPVs9RFPqtUyaVJ_Tnw_ioFiBJItqjJ7ZexbMlevfmGFv1O-7lTX2V-1y8tR7pgW3ypw_yRTHNUjcL9aBVrlM" alt="Test Estimation Techniques" width="500" height="360"/></figure></div>



<p><strong>Following is a list of most common but widely used test estimation techniques:</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Estimation Techniques</strong></td><td>Brief introduction</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Work Breakdown Structure</strong></td><td>It is a method of breaking down large tasks into smaller, easily executable groups</td></tr><tr><td><strong>3-Point Software Estimation Test</strong></td><td>Tasks are broken down into smaller tasks, and then each task is estimated based on 3 points &#8211; Best case, Most likely and Worst case estimates</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Wideband Delphi Method</strong></td><td>It is a technique where an expert set of panel comes together to determine the most probable outcome and they have a common consensus</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Functional Point Analysis</strong></td><td>Large tasks are broken down into small tasks. Each small task is then estimated based on size, cost and duration of project</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Agile Estimation</strong></td><td>In these techniques, the current data and past&nbsp; experience are used for estimation and new information is continuously integrated into the project to refine the process of estimation</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Distribution in Percentage</strong></td><td>Here, every stage is assigned or assessed in terms of percentages. This is to find how much effort should be put into each stage of the testing cycle.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>Check Out: <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/agile-estimation-techniques/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Agile Estimation Techniques</a></p>



<h2 id="test-estimation-best-practices"><span id="Test_estimation_best_practices"><strong>Test estimation best practices</strong></span></h2>



<p>Test estimation is a critical aspect of the <a href="https://www.javatpoint.com/software-engineering-software-development-life-cycle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software development cycle</a>. Accurate estimation helps in planning, resource allocation, and project management. Here are some best practices for test estimation:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Understand Requirements</strong>: You should have a thorough understanding of the project requirements before you begin estimating. Any ambiguities or incomplete requirements can lead to inaccurate estimates.</li><li><strong>Break Down Tasks</strong>: Rather than estimating the whole story as a single value, breakdown the testing effort into smaller, manageable tasks. This will make the estimation process more precise and will reduce the risk of overlooking important aspects.</li><li><strong>Use Historical Data</strong>: Sometimes historical data can help estimate better and faster. A similar story may have been estimated and worked upon earlier. Refer to past projects with similar scope and complexity to gain insights into the testing effort required.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Involve the Right Experts</strong>: Ask your team members if someone else has worked upon a similar story estimation. This input from experienced testers, test leads, and other stakeholders shall improve the accuracy of estimates.</li><li><strong>Use Estimation Techniques</strong>: Utilize the most suitable technique based on the project&#8217;s characteristics.</li><li><strong>Consider Risk Factors</strong>: Any potential risks that may impact testing efforts should be identified in the beginning. Factor in additional time for handling unforeseen issues that could arise during testing.</li><li><strong>Account for Environment and Infrastructure</strong>: Ensure that the required test environments, tools, and infrastructure are considered in the estimation. Setting up and maintaining these resources can take time.</li><li><strong>Review and Validate</strong>: A fresh eye can often see what a repetitive eye cannot see. Ask someone to review and this may help in better estimations.</li><li><strong>Update Estimations</strong>: As the project progresses and more information becomes available, reassess and update the estimates accordingly. Make sure you mention a reason for changing original estimation for any future reference.</li><li><strong>Track and Learn</strong>: Keep track of the actual time and effort spent on testing activities and compare them with the estimated values. Analyze any discrepancies and learn from them to improve future estimations.</li></ul>



<p>Remember that estimation is not an exact science, and unforeseen circumstances can affect the actual effort required. Regularly revisit and adjust the estimates as the project progresses to ensure a successful testing phase.</p>



<h2 id="software-test-estimation-template"><span id="Software_Test_Estimation_Template"><strong>Software Test Estimation Template</strong></span></h2>



<p><strong>Here is a sample template to be used for software estimations.</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Project Name:</strong> [Name of the Project]</td><td>                                                                                                                             </td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estimation Date:</strong> [Date of Estimation]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estimation Prepared By:</strong> [Name of Estimator]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estimation Reviewed By: </strong>[Name of Reviewer]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Project Overview:</strong>[Provide a brief overview of the project, its objectives, and scope.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Scope:</strong>[List the in-scope items for testing, including modules, features, and functionalities.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Types Included:</strong>[List the types of testing that will be performed, such as functional, regression, performance, security, etc.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Assumptions:</strong>[List any assumptions made during the estimation process.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estimation Technique:</strong>[Specify the technique used for estimation (e.g., Expert Judgment, Three-Point Estimation, Delphi Technique, etc.)]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Contingency:</strong>[Specify any contingency effort included to account for unforeseen issues and risks.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dependencies:</strong>[List any dependencies that may impact the testing effort, such as availability of developers or test environment.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Risks and Mitigation Strategies:</strong>[List potential risks related to testing and the strategies planned to mitigate them.]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Estimation Approval:</strong>[Include a section for relevant stakeholders to approve the estimation.]</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Test Effort Breakdown</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Test Activity&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>Estimated Effort (hours/days) |&nbsp;</td><td>Assumptions/Notes</td></tr><tr><td>Test Planning and Strategy</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Case Design</a></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Test Environment Setup</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Test Data Preparation</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Test Execution&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>-Functional<br>-Regression <br>-Performance<br>-Security<br>-Other</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Defect Reporting and Tracking</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-closure-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Closure and Reporting</a></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Estimated Test Effort&nbsp;</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Here is a guide that talks about the different types and techniques of software testing</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/the-different-software-testing-types-explained/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Read more</a>
</div>



<h2 id="summary"><span id="Summary"><strong>Summary</strong></span></h2>



<p>The test estimation techniques are not just useful for testing software but can be helpful for the entire software development life cycle. Above mentioned techniques can be combined with each other to get a much more precise estimation. Getting accurate estimation for any project is a vital step in using the resources, time, and skills to their maximum potential.</p>



What is the 3-point estimation in testing?
The Three-Point Estimation, also known as the PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) estimation, is a technique used in project management, including testing, to provide a more realistic and reliable estimate for task durations or effort. In the context of testing, the Three-Point Estimation involves considering three estimates for each task:
<ul>
<li>Optimistic Estimate (O): This is the best-case scenario estimate, assuming everything goes perfectly without any unexpected issues or delays.</li>
<li>Most Likely Estimate (M): This is the estimate based on a realistic scenario, considering typical challenges and factors that might affect the task.</li>
<li>Pessimistic Estimate (P): This is the worst-case scenario estimate, assuming various difficulties and potential delays come into play.</li>
</ul>
Using these three estimates, the PERT formula is applied to calculate the Expected Duration (ED) or Expected Effort (EE) for the task:<br>
ED=(O+4M+P)/6</br>
This formula places more weight on the “Most Likely Estimate” while incorporating the Optimistic and Pessimistic Estimates to balance out the influence of overly optimistic or pessimistic assumptions.



How many test estimation techniques are available?
There are several test estimation techniques available that project managers and teams can use to estimate the effort, time, and resources required for testing activities. Some of the commonly used test estimation techniques include:

<ul>
<li>Expert Judgment</li>
<li>Analogous Estimation</li>
<li>Parametric Estimation</li>
<li>Three-Point Estimation (PERT)</li>
<li>Delphi Technique</li>
<li>Wideband Delphi</li>
<li>Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)</li>
<li>Use Case Point Estimation</li>
<li>Test Point Analysis</li>
<li>Function Point Analysis</li>
<li>Comparative Estimation</li>
<li>Vendor Bid Analysis</li>
</ul>
These are just a few popular ones. Remember that each of these techniques has its strengths and weaknesses and may be more suitable for different project scenarios. Project managers often choose the technique that aligns with the project&#8217;s characteristics, available data, and team expertise.


Software Test Estimation Techniques & Best Practices


<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Introduction"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Introduction:</a></li><li><a href="#Set_Clear_Goals_and_Expectations"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Set Clear Goals and Expectations:</a><ul><li><a href="#Goalnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Goal:&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#Expectationsnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> Expectations:&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#Foster_a_Culture_of_Collaboration"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> Foster a Culture of Collaboration:</a></li><li><a href="#Invest_in_Continuous_Learning_and_Development"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.4</span> Invest in Continuous Learning and Development:</a></li><li><a href="#Empower_Your_Team"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.5</span> Empower Your Team:</a></li><li><a href="#Promote_Quality_Advocacy"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.6</span> Promote Quality Advocacy:</a></li><li><a href="#Implement_Effective_Processes_and_Tools"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.7</span> Implement Effective Processes and Tools:</a></li><li><a href="#Lead_by_Example"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.8</span> Lead by Example:</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Conclusion:</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-introduction"><span id="Introduction">Introduction:</span></h2>



<p>As the Head of Quality Assurance (QA), you have a crucial role in ensuring the success of your team. Effective leadership can significantly impact the productivity, efficiency, and morale of your QA team. Leading a QA team to success requires more than just technical expertise in quality assurance. It entails effective leadership, strong communication, and the ability to inspire and empower your team members.&nbsp;</p>



<p>As a QA leader, you play a vital role in ensuring the <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/software-quality-assurance-plan/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">quality of software products</a> and driving the team towards excellence. </p>



<p>In this article, we will explore key strategies and best practices that will help you lead your QA team to success. From setting clear goals and fostering a collaborative environment to promoting continuous learning and embracing innovation, we will cover various aspects that contribute to the success of your QA team. So, let&#8217;s delve into the world of QA leadership and discover how you can guide your team to achieve outstanding results in the realm of software quality.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 id="h-set-clear-goals-and-expectations"><span id="Set_Clear_Goals_and_Expectations">Set Clear Goals and Expectations:</span></h2>



<p>A successful QA team needs a clear sense of direction. As the leader, it is your responsibility to define and communicate clear goals and expectations to your team. Establish measurable targets, such as defect reduction rates, test coverage, and customer satisfaction metrics. Ensure that your team understands these objectives and their role in achieving them.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Following example can help you understand how setting up clear goals help in achieving success.</p>



<h3 id="h-goal"><span id="Goalnbsp"><strong>Goal:</strong>&nbsp;</span></h3>



<p>Ensure a high-quality and user-friendly e-commerce platform launch within the specified timeline.</p>



<h3 id="h-expectations"><span id="Expectationsnbsp"><strong>Expectations:&nbsp;</strong></span></h3>



<ul><li><strong><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Coverage</a></strong>: Clearly define the areas of the e-commerce platform that need to be thoroughly tested. This includes functionality, performance, security, and usability. Communicate the expected test coverage to your team, specifying the critical features that must be tested extensively.</li><li><strong>Defect Management</strong>: Set expectations regarding defect management. Define the severity levels and prioritize critical issues that need immediate attention. Clearly communicate the bug reporting process, including the required information in bug reports and the expected response time for addressing issues.</li><li><strong>Test Execution</strong>: Establish expectations for test execution, including the test schedule, test environments, and test data requirements.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Test Documentation</strong>: Set guidelines for test documentation, such as test cases, test scripts, and test results reporting.</li><li><strong>Collaboration with Development Team</strong>: Emphasize the importance of collaboration between the QA and development teams. Clearly communicate the expectations for bug triaging, bug fixing timelines, and effective communication channels between the two teams.</li><li><strong>Timelines and Milestones</strong>: Set clear timelines and milestones for the testing phases, including test planning, test execution, and test closure. Clearly communicate the deadlines and deliverables expected from the QA team at each stage.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-foster-a-culture-of-collaboration"><span id="Foster_a_Culture_of_Collaboration"><strong>Foster a Culture of Collaboration:</strong></span></h3>



<p>Collaboration is essential for a high-performing QA team. Encourage open communication, idea-sharing, and teamwork among your team members. Promote a supportive and inclusive environment where everyone feels comfortable expressing their opinions and contributing to the team&#8217;s success. Encourage cross-functional collaboration with other teams, such as development and product management, to foster a shared responsibility for quality.</p>



<h3 id="h-invest-in-continuous-learning-and-development"><span id="Invest_in_Continuous_Learning_and_Development"><strong>Invest in Continuous Learning and Development:</strong></span></h3>



<p>The world of software testing and quality assurance is constantly evolving. Encourage your team members to stay updated with the latest industry trends, tools, and best practices. Provide opportunities for professional development, such as&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>Training programs</li><li>Workshops</li><li>Certifications. Foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement, where team members can enhance their skills and grow both personally and professionally.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-empower-your-team"><span id="Empower_Your_Team"><strong>Empower Your Team:</strong></span></h3>



<p>To achieve success, empower your team members to make decisions and take ownership of their work. Provide them with the autonomy and authority to execute their tasks effectively. Encourage innovation and creativity in problem-solving. When team members feel trusted and empowered, they become more engaged and motivated to excel in their roles.</p>



<h3 id="h-promote-quality-advocacy"><span id="Promote_Quality_Advocacy"><strong>Promote Quality Advocacy:</strong></span></h3>



<p>As the head of QA, it is crucial to instill a strong sense of quality advocacy within your team. Quality should be everyone&#8217;s responsibility, from developers to testers. Encourage proactive quality assurance practices, such as early involvement in the development process, promoting test-driven development, and conducting thorough code reviews. Emphasize the importance of preventing defects rather than just finding them, fostering a proactive and preventive approach to quality.</p>



<h3 id="h-implement-effective-processes-and-tools"><span id="Implement_Effective_Processes_and_Tools"><strong>Implement Effective Processes and Tools:</strong></span></h3>



<p><p style="padding-bottom:15px">Efficient processes and reliable tools are the backbone of a successful QA team. Evaluate your team&#8217;s current processes and identify areas for improvement. Implement streamlined workflows, standardized testing methodologies, and effective test management practices. Explore and adopt suitable testing tools and technologies that can enhance productivity and efficiency. Regularly review and refine these processes to ensure continuous improvement.</p></p>



<p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="display: block;
    margin: auto;"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 10x faster, with Testsigma</a></button></p>



<br><h3 id="h-lead-by-example"><span id="Lead_by_Example"><strong>Lead by Example:</strong></span></h3>



<p>As a leader, your actions speak louder than words. Lead by example and embody the qualities you expect from your team. Demonstrate a strong work ethic, integrity, and a commitment to quality. Be approachable, supportive, and empathetic towards your team members. Celebrate their achievements and recognize their contributions. A positive and inspiring leader can motivate the team to go above and beyond.</p>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion:</span></h2>



<p>Leading a QA team to success requires a combination of effective leadership skills, a supportive work environment, and a focus on continuous improvement. By setting clear goals, fostering collaboration, investing in learning and development, empowering team members, promoting quality advocacy, implementing efficient processes, and leading by example, you can guide your team towards achieving exceptional results. Remember, success is not just about delivering defect-free software; it&#8217;s about building a resilient, proactive, and high-performing team that consistently delivers value and exceeds expectations.</p>


Wait a second...Did you try Testsigma?

Wait a second...
Did you try Testsigma?