One more reason to keep raising the bar in test automation.



As we prepare to wrap up 2024 and carry forward the momentum AI has brought across industries, we’re thrilled to share some news that truly adds a feather to our cap. Testsigma has been recognized as a Momentum Leader in G2&#8217;s Winter 2025 Report for Software Testing and Automation Testing. The quadrant highlights products that are highly rated by customers for their performance and reliability, making this recognition especially meaningful for us.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Recent_Stats_from_G2s_State_of_Testing">1 Recent Stats from G2’s State of Testing:</a></li><li><a href="#Listening_to_the_Voice_of_Our_Customers">2 Listening to the Voice of Our Customers</a></li><li><a href="#Mid-Market_Automation_Testing_Report_Scoring_Description">3 Mid-Market Automation Testing Report Scoring Description</a></li><li><a href="#What_makes_Testsigma_stand_out">4 What makes Testsigma stand out?</a></li><li><a href="#About_G2_Reviews">5 About G2 Reviews</a></li><li><a href="#About_Testsigma">6 About Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#Looking_Ahead">7 Looking Ahead</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-recent-stats-from-g2-s-state-of-testing">Recent Stats from G2’s State of Testing:</h2>



 According to G2’s latest data, automation testing continues to see rapid adoption among enterprises of all sizes. Key stats include:



<ul><li>80% of mid-market companies now rely on automation testing tools to accelerate delivery cycles.</li><li>Tools with low-code and AI-powered capabilities have seen a 50% increase in adoption compared to last year.</li><li>Customer satisfaction ratings emphasize ease of integration and scalability as top priorities.</li></ul>



These insights highlight the growing importance of intuitive, codeless, AI-driven solutions like Testsigma.



<h2 id="listening-to-the-voice-of-our-customers">Listening to the Voice of Our Customers</h2>



 When we listen to our customers, one thing is clear: The shift to automation testing is driven by the need to deliver faster, better software. At Testsigma, we&#8217;ve always focused on making testing simpler and more accessible for everyone, and our recognition as a Momentum Leader in G2’s Winter 2025 Mid-Market Report for Software Testing and Automation Testing is yet another proof of that effort.



Words That Motivate Us Every Day



We chose Testsigma for its ease of use and flexibility. 80% of our test coverage is automated now, improving our software quality. 80% Automated Test Coverage Jan-Clément Leloup Technical Support Engineer



With Testsigma, we′ve reduced our test execution time from 8 weeks to just 5 weeks per sprint. 75% Regression Suite Automated Holly Pennington Test Manager



<h2 id="mid-market-automation-testing-report-scoring-description">Mid-Market Automation Testing Report Scoring Description</h2>



 Products in the Mid-Market Automation Testing Report are evaluated based on customer satisfaction and market presence. Testsigma’s high customer satisfaction scores, especially for quality of support and ease of use, have earned us recognition as a Momentum Leader in Software Testing and Automation Testing.



For mid-market teams, this shows that Testsigma is a reliable choice for growing businesses needing faster automation testing without complicated setups or advanced technical skills. Our platform helps teams create automated functional tests 10X faster using plain English and GenAI, making testing simpler and faster without any misses. While this is an important milestone, there’s much more to come.



<h2 id="what-makes-testsigma-stand-out">What makes Testsigma stand out?</h2>



 If you want to simplify test automation and tackle issues such as complex workflows, complicated setups, or skill gaps, here’s why you should connect with us:



<ul><li>Get 10X faster test automation to increase test coverage.</li><li>Reduce your testing effort by 70% with a low-code approach and AI-driven maintenance.</li><li>Witness 30% shorter release cycles with continuous testing, providing rapid feedback.</li></ul>



Along with solid results, we are a fast-growing company experiencing strong organic customer growth and excellent user retention, reflecting the trust and value our platform delivers.



<h2 id="about-g2-reviews">About G2 Reviews</h2>



 G2 is a peer-to-peer review site that empowers businesses to make informed decisions about software tools. Their reports are based on real customer feedback, making them a trusted resource for buyers worldwide. Testsigma’s inclusion in the Winter 2025 report reflects the trust and satisfaction of our users, as well as our growing presence as a Momentum Leader in Software Testing and Automation Testing.



<h2 id="about-testsigma">About Testsigma</h2>



 Testsigma is a GenAI-powered, low-code platform that accelerates testing cycles without compromising quality. Using a Natural Language Programming approach, it lets users create complex automated tests in plain English while retaining the structure of programming languages. With built-in GenAI features, QA teams can generate test scenarios quickly, ensuring comprehensive coverage and reducing development effort.



<h2 id="looking-ahead">Looking Ahead</h2>



This recognition as a Momentum Leader is a step forward, and there’s so much more to come. We’re gearing up to launch new features, including a comprehensive test management suite, to further enhance your testing workflows. So stay tuned!



If simplifying your testing process with no-code automation sounds exciting, <a href="https://testsigma.com/request-demo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">book a free demo</a> with us today and see how Testsigma can make testing simpler and faster for your team.

Testsigma Stands Out in G2 Winter 2025 Automation Testing Report

Testsigma Stands Out in G2 Winter 2024 Mid Market Testing Report

TestFLO vs Xray – Top 10 Key Differences

Is Automation Testing a Good Career?

Hoppscotch and Postman &#8211; they are both popular tools for API testing and development and offer a diverse set of features, including ease of use, collaboration, and real-time response monitoring. If you are at the intersection of choosing any one of these tools, this Hoppscotch vs Postman debate might help you arrive at your destination. The <a href="https://testsigma.com/compare-test-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">comparison of test automation tools</a> helps take the right decision.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Hoppscotch_vs_Postman_8211_Overview">1 Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Overview </a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Hoppscotch">1.1 What is Hoppscotch?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Postman">1.2 What is Postman?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Hoppscotch_vs_Postman_8211_Detailed_Comparison">2 Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Detailed Comparison</a><ul><li><a href="#Pros_of_Hoppscotch">2.1 Pros of Hoppscotch</a></li><li><a href="#Cons_of_Hoppscotch">2.2 Cons of Hoppscotch</a></li><li><a href="#What_Companies_Use_Hoppscotch">2.3 What Companies Use Hoppscotch?</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigma_vs_Hoppscotch">2.4 Testsigma vs Hoppscotch</a></li><li><a href="#Pros_of_Postman">2.5 Pros of Postman</a></li><li><a href="#Cons_of_Postman">2.6 Cons of Postman</a></li><li><a href="#What_Companies_Use_Postman">2.7 What Companies Use Postman?</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigma_vs_Postman">2.8 Testsigma vs Postman</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Hoppscotch_vs_Postman_8211_10_Key_Differences">3 Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; 10 Key Differences</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigma_vs_Hoppscotch_vs_Postman_8211_Which_is_Better">4 Testsigma vs Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Which is Better?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">5 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">6 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Which_is_the_best_Postman_alternative">6.1 Which is the best Postman alternative?</a></li><li><a href="#Which_is_better_Postman_or_REST_Assured">6.2 Which is better, Postman or REST Assured?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="hoppscotch-vs-postman-overview">Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Overview </h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-hoppscotch">What is Hoppscotch?</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXfGesWw_cU55nKds0Q9bYYSza2NhgkHHURnlWFIvvthlw9BMCfUQuw4fL8-Hei5RHEE7f0OxCtHc_BSJGab9zRRPfVcWDI6XPyanl_TZLpEoPbTZV6mrSIb7lDrB9Zd6pXMGqW30nKppEvkH-9e4eibhw?key=DfHolKJV2njQaynpp71Ecw" alt="Hoppscotch" /></figure>



Hoppscotch is an open-source API development ecosystem that simplifies sending requests, designing APIs, and monitoring responses. It provides a user-friendly interface for interacting with APIs, offering features such as real-time response monitoring, request history, and environment variables.



<h3 id="h-what-is-postman">What is Postman?</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="798" height="134" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Postman.jpg" alt="Postman" class="wp-image-31366" /></figure>



Postman is a popular collaboration platform for API development, used by developers to design, test, and document APIs. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for building and managing APIs, including features like API testing, automated testing, API monitoring, and API documentation.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/postman-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Postman Alternatives</a>



<h2 id="hoppscotch-vs-postman-detailed-comparison">Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Detailed Comparison</h2>



<h3 id="h-pros-of-hoppscotch">Pros of Hoppscotch</h3>



<ul><li>User-Friendly Interface: Hoppscotch offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.</li><li>Real-Time Response Monitoring: Users can monitor API responses in real time, which facilitates quick debugging and troubleshooting.</li><li>Open-Source: Being open-source, Hoppscotch encourages community contributions and allows for customization according to specific needs.</li><li>Request History: It maintains a history of requests that allows users to revisit and reuse previous requests effortlessly.</li><li>Environment Variables: It supports environment variables for users to manage and switch between different environments seamlessly.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-cons-of-hoppscotch">Cons of Hoppscotch</h3>



<ul><li>Limited Collaboration Features: Unlike some other API development tools, Hoppscotch may lack certain features, such as team collaboration and version control.</li><li>Less Comprehensive Documentation: The documentation for Hoppscotch may not be as extensive or detailed compared to some other tools.</li><li>Dependency on Browser: It operates as a browser extension or web application, which may limit its capabilities compared to standalone desktop applications.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-what-companies-use-hoppscotch">What Companies Use Hoppscotch?</h3>



Hoppscotch came in 2019 and has since become a popular API development suite. It is lightweight, web-based, and comes with security features. Some of the big companies using Hoppscotch are Microsoft, Google, Verizon, RedHat, IBM, Salesforce, Cisco, SMARTTechStack, and OLX.



<h3 id="h-testsigma-vs-hoppscotch">Testsigma vs Hoppscotch</h3>



Testsigma and Hoppscotch serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle.



Testsigma is an automated testing platform that focuses on test automation, whereas Hoppscotch is primarily used for API development and testing.&nbsp;



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXeG8LuA5eNyv4xhNr1uGDY9YD9zznWKSLPl8Y5AJsc6py5hKXCwh0peTFo8SaRmMZWjt6z3ewkE4cz4IMkAM4Ey0L_coxNahHP4EE6VNI4YjMCedJIlIRW8_sOOExD-9ocIrrVUmaKGH_i8q9ao89KX11JP?key=DfHolKJV2njQaynpp71Ecw" alt="" /></figure>



Create and write low-code test cases using pre-defined NLP commands



While both tools are valuable in their respective domains, Testsigma specializes in automated testing for web and mobile applications, offering features such as parallel test execution, cross-browser testing, and self-healing. The tool consists of distinct aspects that also include API testing, which validates responses in real time. You can also integrate API tests with functional testing in Testsigma.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Elevate your testing efforts by 10x for web, mobile, and API testing without coding a single line using Testing
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



On the other hand, Hoppscotch excels in simplifying API interaction and monitoring, providing developers with a user-friendly interface for designing and testing APIs.



<h3 id="h-pros-of-postman">Pros of Postman</h3>



<ul><li>User-Friendly Interface: Postman provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to create and execute API requests.</li><li>Comprehensive Testing Features: It offers a wide range of testing capabilities, including manual testing, automated testing, and performance testing.</li><li>Automation: Postman allows for the automation of repetitive tasks, such as API testing and monitoring, through scripts and collections.</li><li>Collaboration: Postman facilitates collaboration among team members through features like shared workspaces, team libraries, and version control.</li><li>Extensive Documentation: It offers robust documentation features, including the generation of API documentation from requests and responses.</li></ul>



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/rest-assured-vs-postman/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">REST Assured vs Postman</a>



<h3 id="h-cons-of-postman">Cons of Postman</h3>



<ul><li>Limited Free Tier: While Postman offers a free tier, some advanced features and capabilities are only available in paid plans.</li><li>Steep Learning Curve: Postman has a learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its wide range of features and capabilities.</li><li>Performance: In some cases, users may experience performance issues, especially when working with large collections or performing complex operations.</li></ul>



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/karate-vs-postman/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Karate vs Postman</a>



<h3 id="h-what-companies-use-postman">What Companies Use Postman?</h3>



Similar to Hoppscotch, Postman also boasts of having a client base of big enterprises, including Google, Microsoft, Twitter, Salesforce, Shopify, and Adobe.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/jmeter-vs-postman/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JMeter vs Postman</a>



<h3 id="h-testsigma-vs-postman">Testsigma vs Postman</h3>



Testsigma and Postman serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle.



Testsigma is primarily focused on automated testing, offering features such as low-code test automation, parallel test execution, and cross-browser testing for web and mobile applications.



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXfcgOh8h5DvQh2jtT9k6FFeOOADNogHIiqMvgUfMD4e5ZvIjnlwddcM4MaIt34T9mepoCD9l5adEPU5eTGulNK2HytPSnyN9mSqMBobMjxuG07KmsZEFbez3yRUiKINiVrsJMVDZC4_d2ZztVDTfzEOB62m?key=DfHolKJV2njQaynpp71Ecw" alt="" /></figure>



Enter the endpoint, select the method, add headers, set the status code, and run the test



Postman specializes in API development and testing, providing a comprehensive suite of tools for designing, testing, and documenting APIs.&nbsp;



While both tools are valuable in their respective domains, Testsigma excels in end-to-end automated testing for applications, whereas Postman is ideal for API-related tasks such as testing, monitoring, and documentation.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Start End-to-End Testing within Minutes using Testsigma without Switching between Tools for Testing, Documentation, and Monitoring 
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-hoppscotch-vs-postman-10-key-differences">Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; 10 Key Differences</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Feature</td><td>Hoppscotch</td><td>Postman</td><td>Testsigma</td></tr><tr><td>Purpose</td><td>Simplifies sending requests, designing APIs, and monitoring responses</td><td>Collaboration platform for API development, testing, and documentation</td><td>Simplifies and accelerates the process of automating web, mobile, and API testing without coding</td></tr><tr><td>Interface</td><td>Intuitive and user-friendly</td><td>Intuitive and user-friendly</td><td>user-friendly, intuitive interface</td></tr><tr><td>Open-Source</td><td>Yes</td><td>No (Proprietary software with a free tier)</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Real-Time Monitoring</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Supports real-time monitoring and reporting</td></tr><tr><td>Request History</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Maintains a detailed history of test executions, including logs, results, and any changes made</td></tr><tr><td>Environment Variables</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Supports the use of environment variables</td></tr><tr><td>Collaboration</td><td>Limited</td><td>Extensive</td><td>Promotes collaboration with features like role-based access control, shared test cases, and project-level management</td></tr><tr><td>Automation</td><td>Basic</td><td>Advanced (scripting, automated testing, etc.)</td><td>Excels in automation, offering codeless automation capabilities for web, mobile, and API testing</td></tr><tr><td>Pricing</td><td>Free</td><td>Freemium (Free tier with paid plans available)</td><td>Subscription-based pricing model with multiple tiers, including free tier</td></tr><tr><td>Extensive Features</td><td>No</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



Also read <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/insomnia-vs-postman/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Insomnia vs Postman</a>



<h2 id="h-testsigma-vs-hoppscotch-vs-postman-which-is-better">Testsigma vs Hoppscotch vs Postman &#8211; Which is Better?</h2>



When considering which tool—Testsigma, Hoppscotch, or Postman—is better suited for a company&#8217;s needs, it&#8217;s essential to evaluate their respective strengths and how they align with the company&#8217;s requirements and goals.



For companies focused on <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automated testing</a> and looking to optimize their testing processes, Testsigma may be the preferred choice due to its AI-driven automation capabilities and focus on test efficiency. It supports web application automated testing, mobile app testing, and API testing. Testsigma takes the lead in end-to-end testing opportunities.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate End-to-End Tests for Web, Mobile, and API 10x Faster with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



However, for companies primarily engaged in API development and testing, particularly those seeking simplicity and ease of use, Hoppscotch could be the better fit. On the other hand, for organizations with complex API ecosystems and a strong emphasis on collaboration and documentation, Postman may offer the most comprehensive solution.



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



API testing is crucial, and manually checking them is not ideal. Clearly, the right approach includes API development and testing tools that offer a diverse array of options. Among a sea of options, we bring you the two most prominent candidates in the API testing landscape— Hoppscotch and Postman. They have been around for a while and carry features to perform easy and complex API testing scenarios. The differences between Hoppscotch and Postman will help you decide which tool is the right fit for your business.



Alternatively, the low-code test automation tool, Testsigma, is a worthy contender if you are looking to adopt something that is not just limited to testing APIs but also includes web and mobile testing features.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-which-is-the-best-postman-alternative">Which is the best Postman alternative?</h3>



Insomnia, Testsigma, Hoppscotch, and Katalon Studio are some of the best Postman alternatives, offering similar features for <a href="https://appinventiv.com/blog/complete-guide-to-api-development/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">API development</a> and testing. They come with a clean interface, advanced debugging tools, and robust collaboration features, making them a popular choice among developers.



<h3 id="h-which-is-better-postman-or-rest-assured">Which is better, Postman or REST Assured?</h3>



Choosing between <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/rest-assured-vs-postman/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Postman and REST Assured</a> depends on the specific requirements. Postman is preferable for its user-friendly interface and collaboration capabilities, while REST Assured is favored for Java-based testing projects, offering more flexibility and control for API testing in Java environments.

Hoppscotch vs Postman | Top 10 Key Differences

PractiTest vs Zephyr- Key Differences

Salesforce QA Testing – What, Why, and How to Perform?

Despite the surge in automated testing and AI tools out there, testing manually is still super important for making sure software works right.&nbsp;



As a Manual tester, cultivating a mindset of critical thinking is key to verifying product functionality and aligning actual outcomes with expected results. Proficiency in <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/manual-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">manual testing</a> requires a diverse skill set, encompassing the evaluation of usability, performance, security, and accessibility aspects.



Here are some unique skills that can elevate a manual tester&#8217;s effectiveness in ensuring exceptional software quality:



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#1_Strong_Analytical_Skills">1 1. Strong Analytical Skills</a></li><li><a href="#2_Proficiency_in_API_Testing">2 2. Proficiency in API Testing:</a></li><li><a href="#3_Understanding_of_Databases">3 3. Understanding of Databases:</a></li><li><a href="#4_Solid_Testing_Concepts">4 4. Solid Testing Concepts:</a></li><li><a href="#5_Familiarity_with_HTTP_Status_Codes">5 5. Familiarity with HTTP Status Codes:</a></li><li><a href="#6_Knowledge_of_Version_Control_Systems_like_GIT">6 6. Knowledge of Version Control Systems like GIT:</a></li><li><a href="#7_Effective_Communication_Skills">7 7. Effective Communication Skills:</a></li><li><a href="#8_Familiarity_with_Agile_Methodology">8 8. Familiarity with Agile Methodology:</a></li><li><a href="#9_Cross-Browser_Testing_Proficiency">9 9. Cross-Browser Testing Proficiency:</a></li><li><a href="#10_Understanding_of_Software_Development_Life_Cycle_SDLC">10 10. Understanding of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC):</a></li><li><a href="#11_Accessibility_Testing_Skills">11 11. Accessibility Testing Skills:</a></li><li><a href="#12_Performance_Testing_Proficiency">12 12. Performance Testing Proficiency:</a></li><li><a href="#13_Security_Testing_Awareness">13 13. Security Testing Awareness:</a></li><li><a href="#16_JIRA">14 16. JIRA:</a></li><li><a href="#17_Mobile_Testing">15 17. Mobile Testing:</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">16 Conclusion:</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-1-strong-analytical-skills">1. Strong Analytical Skills</h2>



Analytical skills are vital for thinking outside the box and generating edge cases for thorough product testing. Simply verifying requirements and following the happy path is not sufficient. Additionally,&nbsp; skilled manual testers must also possess strong analytical capabilities to troubleshoot unexpected issues encountered during testing sessions.



<h2 id="h-2-proficiency-in-api-testing">2. Proficiency in API Testing:</h2>



Understanding Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) is becoming increasingly crucial for manual testers, especially in the age of interconnected systems. Testers should be familiar with the basics of <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/api-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">API testing</a>, including how to interact with APIs and validate their responses.&nbsp;



Proficiency in tools like POSTMAN enables testers to send requests, inspect responses, and verify the functionality of API endpoints. Moreover, knowledge of RESTful and SOAP APIs helps testers thoroughly check the behind-the-scenes part of the software, making sure data is kept safe and the system works reliably.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/tools/manual-testing-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Manual Testing Tools</a>



<h2 id="h-3-understanding-of-databases">3. Understanding of Databases:</h2>



Since data is the backbone of many software applications, testers must have a solid understanding of databases. This includes knowledge of database management systems (DBMS) such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, or MongoDB.&nbsp;



Testers should be comfortable writing and executing SQL queries to validate data, perform CRUD operations, and verify data transformations. Furthermore, familiarity with database schema enables testers to design test scenarios that cover various data scenarios and edge cases.



<h2 id="h-4-solid-testing-concepts">4. Solid Testing Concepts:</h2>



A strong foundation in testing concepts is fundamental for manual testers. They should understand the principles of test design, including creating test cases, test scenarios, and test plans.&nbsp;



Moreover, testers should be proficient in identifying, documenting, and prioritizing defects using <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-tracking-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">defect-tracking tools</a> like JIRA or Bugzilla. Understanding different types of testing, such as functional testing, regression testing, and user acceptance testing, gives testers the ability to tailor their approach based on project requirements and constraints.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/test-cases-for-manual-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Cases for Manual Testing</a>



<h2 id="h-5-familiarity-with-http-status-codes">5. Familiarity with HTTP Status Codes:</h2>



Manual testers should be familiar with Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status codes and their meanings. This knowledge is particularly valuable when testing web applications and APIs. HTTP status codes provide valuable insights into the server&#8217;s response and help testers diagnose issues more effectively.&nbsp;



For example, a 404 status code indicates that the requested resource was not found, while a 500 status code signifies a server error. By understanding these codes, testers can communicate more precisely with developers which can further help them to fix the problems faster.



<h2 id="h-6-knowledge-of-version-control-systems-like-git">6. Knowledge of Version Control Systems like GIT:</h2>



Version control systems like GIT play a pivotal role in software development and testing. Manual testers often collaborate with developers and need to understand how version control works to access the latest code changes.&nbsp;



Basic GIT knowledge, including tagging, merging, and reverting changes facilitates seamless collaboration and ensures that testers are always working with the most up-to-date codebase. In many product companies, it&#8217;s often QA&#8217;s responsibility to merge developers&#8217; code or pull requests into the main codebase. Therefore, having a grasp of GIT basics is crucial for manual QA testers.



<h2 id="h-7-effective-communication-skills">7. Effective Communication Skills:</h2>



Effective communication is essential for manual testers to convey their findings accurately in the form of defects and collaborate with cross-functional teams. Testers should be able to articulate test results, raise defects, and suggest improvements clearly and concisely.&nbsp;



Additionally, active listening skills are crucial for understanding project requirements, gathering feedback, and resolving conflicts efficiently. By creating open communication channels, testers can foster a collaborative testing environment and contribute positively to the overall project&#8217;s success.



<h2 id="h-8-familiarity-with-agile-methodology">8. Familiarity with Agile Methodology:</h2>



In agile development environments, testers need to adapt quickly to changing requirements and priorities. They should have a solid understanding of agile methodologies such as Scrum or Kanban and actively participate in agile ceremonies like sprint planning, daily stand-ups, and retrospectives.&nbsp;



Testers should embrace the iterative nature of agile development and focus on delivering value to end-users in short development cycles. Additionally, being responsive to feedback and continuously improving testing processes are key aspects of being a manual tester.



<h2 id="h-9-cross-browser-testing-proficiency">9. Cross-Browser Testing Proficiency:</h2>



As web applications become more widespread, manual testers need to make sure they work well on different browsers and devices. Testers should conduct cross-browser testing to identify potential UI inconsistencies or functional discrepancies.&nbsp;



This involves testing web applications on popular browsers such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari across different operating systems and versions. Moreover, testers should leverage browser developer tools to inspect page elements, debug JavaScript code, and analyze network requests for performance optimization.



<h2 id="h-10-understanding-of-software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">10. Understanding of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC):</h2>



Understanding the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is essential for manual testers to align their testing activities with the development process. Testers should be familiar with SDLC phases such as requirements gathering, design, development, testing, deployment, and maintenance.&nbsp;



This enables testers to identify the appropriate testing activities for each phase and ensure that quality is maintained throughout the software development process. Additionally, knowledge of different testing methodologies and frameworks empowers testers to select the most suitable approach based on project constraints and objectives.



<h2 id="h-11-accessibility-testing-skills">11. Accessibility Testing Skills:</h2>



Making sure web apps are easy to use for people with disabilities is super important. Testers need to know about rules like WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) and how to check if apps meet these rules.&nbsp;



This means looking at things like if you can navigate with just a keyboard, if screen readers work if colors are clear, and if the HTML is set up right. When testers do good accessibility tests, they help make sure everyone can use the app easily.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/is-manual-testing-a-good-career/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Is testing manually a good career?</a>



<h2 id="h-12-performance-testing-proficiency">12. Performance Testing Proficiency:</h2>



Manual testers should be able to assess the performance of web applications by conducting load testing, <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/software-stress-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">stress testing</a>, and other performance testing techniques. Understanding how to identify and measure key performance indicators (KPIs) such as response time, throughput, and resource utilization is essential for ensuring optimal application performance under varying conditions.



<h2 id="h-13-security-testing-awareness">13. Security Testing Awareness:</h2>



Manual testers should have a basic understanding of common security vulnerabilities and how to test for them. This includes conducting security testing techniques such as penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and authentication testing to identify potential security risks in web applications. Awareness of security best practices and compliance standards can help testers identify and mitigate security threats effectively.



<h2 id="h-16-jira">16. JIRA:</h2>



JIRA is an agile project management tool widely utilized across various companies today. It serves as a central platform for referencing stories, creating Epics, and setting up boards such as Kanban or Scrum. Familiarity with JIRA is invaluable for testers as it enhances their adaptability across different organizations. Essential skills include creating tasks, raising defects, and effectively utilizing filters and dashboards.



In today&#8217;s workplace, showcasing work is just as crucial as completing it. Therefore, knowing how to create dashboards, filter issues, and share insights with the team are expected skills from manual testers in most companies today.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/is-manual-testing-becoming-a-bottleneck-in-continuous-delivery/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Challenges in testing manually </a>



<h2 id="h-17-mobile-testing">17. Mobile Testing:</h2>



The percentage of Internet traffic for mobile devices has seen a massive increase over the last decade. According to a recent <a href="https://explodingtopics.com/blog/mobile-internet-traffic" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">survey</a>, over 60% of website traffic now comes from mobile devices, with 92.3% of internet users accessing the internet via mobile phones. With approximately 4.32 billion active mobile internet users, it&#8217;s crucial to understand how to conduct <a href="http://5What is Mobile App Testing: Definition, Types and Process Testsigma https://testsigma.com › mobile-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">mobile testing</a>.



Ensuring that your website functions well across various devices is essential. It&#8217;s one of the most important aspects to consider during testing. Testing on different mobile devices is necessary to ensure that all functionalities work seamlessly and that there are no issues or broken features.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/manual-testing-interview-questions/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Manual Testing Interview Questions</a>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion:</h2>



In conclusion, while automation undoubtedly plays a crucial role in streamlining the testing process, the human element remains indispensable in ensuring software quality. By developing innovative skills such as user-centric testing, exploratory testing expertise, cross-functional collaboration, adaptability to emerging technologies, and critical thinking, manual testers can elevate their role from mere validators to invaluable contributors in the pursuit of software excellence.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing-which-one-should-you-choose/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>



Testsigma is a test automation tool, especially made for the manual team, that helps you automate your regression tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 10x faster, while authoring tests in simple English. This increases the availability of manual testers for user-centric and exploratory testing.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your regression tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 10x faster with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>

Skills for Manual Testing

At Testsigma, we believe that accessibility isn’t just a checkbox—it’s a fundamental principle of modern digital products. That’s why I’m incredibly excited to announce the addition of Accessibility testing to our low-code test automation platform.&nbsp;



In a world where accessibility compliance is becoming a legal requirement, we want to help quality engineering teams stay ahead. Our new Accessibility Testing feature automates compliance with global standards like WCAG 2.2 and ensures inclusivity for users of all abilities.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Why_Accessibility_Matters">1 Why Accessibility Matters</a></li><li><a href="#Why_You_Should_Act_Now">2 Why You Should Act Now</a></li><li><a href="#How_Testsigma8217s_Accessibility_Testing_Can_Help_You">3 How Testsigma&#8217;s Accessibility Testing Can Help You</a></li><li><a href="#Moving_Toward_a_More_Inclusive_Digital_World">4 Moving Toward a More Inclusive Digital World</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-why-accessibility-matters">Why Accessibility Matters</h2>



Accessibility goes beyond meeting legal requirements; it’s about providing equal opportunity in the digital age. As more businesses realize the importance of inclusive design, we’re here to empower software engineering teams to ship compliant and inclusive web applications more easily than ever. Testsigma’s codeless test automation platform makes it easier than ever to ship compliant software since it lets anyone write and execute automated tests using plain English.



<h2 id="h-why-you-should-act-now">Why You Should Act Now</h2>



The European Accessibility Act (EAA) mandates that all digital platforms be fully compliant by June 2025. This means businesses worldwide must act fast to avoid penalties and ensure their products meet legal standards, especially in the banking, healthcare, and government sectors.&nbsp;



<h2 id="h-how-testsigma-s-accessibility-testing-can-help-you">How Testsigma&#8217;s Accessibility Testing Can Help You</h2>



<ul><li>Automated WCAG 2.1 Compliance Testsigma handles the heavy lifting, automatically checking your applications against Level A, AA, and AAA standards. From color contrast issues to focus order, it identifies the gaps so you can fix them faster.</li><li>Seamless Integration No setup, no separate tools needed. Accessibility testing fits directly into your existing workflows, alongside your functional, API, and visual tests.</li><li>Codeless Test Creation You don’t need to be an accessibility expert or a code-heavy developer. Our low-code platform makes it easy for anyone on your team to contribute to testing.</li><li>Real-Time Insights Receive detailed reports on accessibility issues during the development cycle, enabling proactive fixes before your product reaches users.</li></ul>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Stay ahead of the June 2025 EAA deadline with WCAG 2.2 compliance.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-accessibility-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try Testsigma for Free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-moving-toward-a-more-inclusive-digital-world">Moving Toward a More Inclusive Digital World</h2>



At Testsigma, we’re committed to helping businesses deliver products everyone can use, regardless of their abilities. This new capability is just one of many steps to ensure that the digital world is inclusive, compliant, and accessible for all.&nbsp;



<a href="https://meet.testsigma.com/campaign/intro?name=there&amp;email=your%20email" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Talk to us</a> today and experience how Testsigma can help your team build accessible digital products that comply with global standards.



If you&#8217;re an existing user interested in enhancing your accessibility features, <a href="https://meet.testsigma.com/campaign/intro?name=there&amp;email=your%20email" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reach out to us</a> &#8211; we can help you set everything up from the start.&nbsp;



Thank you for joining us on this journey. We look forward to helping you build the future of accessible, inclusive digital products.

Testsigma's Codeless Accessibility Testing

Introducing Testsigma’s Codeless Accessibility Testing

Defect density is crucial when testing software and ensuring its high quality, because it measures the number of defects in the software compared to how big the software is in terms of lines of code or function points.&nbsp;



When doing test automation, defect density becomes even more important because it helps you determine which software parts are more likely to have issues and need more testing.&nbsp;



Monitoring defect density over time also tells you if your improvements are making a difference, so it&#8217;s a great tool for keeping your software improving.



Lets discuss more in detail about Defect Density in this blog.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Defect_Density">1 What is Defect Density?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_calculate_Defect_Density">2 How to calculate Defect Density?</a></li><li><a href="#Defect_Density_Example">3 Defect Density Example</a></li><li><a href="#Uses_of_Defect_Density">4 Uses of Defect Density</a></li><li><a href="#Factors_Affecting_Defect_Density_Metrics">5 Factors Affecting Defect Density Metrics</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_Defect_Density">6 Advantages of Defect Density</a></li><li><a href="#Calculate_Defect_Density_For_Test_Automation">7 Calculate Defect Density For Test Automation</a></li><li><a href="#Summary">8 Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">9 Frequently Asked Questions</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_a_good_defect_density">10 What is a good defect density?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_a_normal_defect_rate">11 What is a normal defect rate?</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-defect-density">What is Defect Density?</h2>



Defect Density is a measure used in <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a> to quantify the number of defects found in a piece of software or a component relative to its size. It is typically expressed as the number of defects per thousand lines of code (KLOC).&nbsp;



This metric helps assess the software&#8217;s quality and reliability, guiding project teams in identifying areas that need more focused testing and improvement.



<h2 id="h-how-to-calculate-defect-density">How to calculate Defect Density?</h2>



We can calculate it using the following formula:



Defect Density = (Number of Defects) / (Size of the Software Entity)



The size is typically measured in<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_lines_of_code" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"> Lines of Code</a> (LOC), Function Points (FP), or modules/components. The chosen unit depends on the project context and industry standards.



For example, if a software application has 50 confirmed defects and the size is 10,000 lines of code, then the Defect Density would be 0.005 defects per line of code.



<h2 id="h-defect-density-example">Defect Density Example</h2>



Let us look at two different examples to understand better about this:



<ol><li>Defect Density Example: E-commerce Website</li></ol>



Imagine we&#8217;re developing a new e-commerce website. Here&#8217;s how defect density can be applied:



Scenario:



<ul><li>The website has 200 confirmed defects after testing.</li><li>The size is measured in Function Points (FP), estimated to be 100 FP.</li></ul>



Calculation:



Defect Density = (Number of Defects) / (Size of the Software Entity)



Defect Density = 200 defects / 100 FP



Defect Density = 2 defects per FP



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1280" height="720" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/18074922/91479cc8-2f80-4c9a-a2fc-89f2421d877e.jpg" alt="defect density calculation" class="wp-image-50921" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/18074922/91479cc8-2f80-4c9a-a2fc-89f2421d877e.jpg 1280w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/18074922/91479cc8-2f80-4c9a-a2fc-89f2421d877e-768x432.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px" /></figure>



Interpretation:



This is a relatively high defect density. While a specific benchmark depends on the e-commerce industry and development approach (Agile might have a slightly higher tolerance), it suggests room for improvement.



Further Analysis:



<ul><li>We should analyze the severity distribution of defects. Are there any critical bugs or mostly minor UI issues?</li><li>We can track defect density over different development phases. Did it decrease after additional testing cycles?</li></ul>



Decision Making:



Based on the analysis, we can decide on:



<ul><li>Additional testing: More testing might be needed if critical defects are prevalent.</li><li>Process improvement: Are there recurring defect types? This might indicate a need for improved coding practices or code reviews.</li><li>Release prioritization: If resources are limited, fixing high-impact defects might take priority before addressing minor ones.</li></ul>



This example highlights how defect density provides a starting point for software quality assessment, leading to further analysis and informed decisions regarding testing and development processes.



<ol start="2"><li>Defect Density Example: Mobile App with Severity Levels</li></ol>



Let&#8217;s consider a mobile app with two functionalities: login and news feed. We&#8217;ll track the defects found during testing and categorize them by severity (critical, major, minor).



Scenario:



<ul><li>Login functionality: 10,000 lines of code (LOC) <ul><li>Critical defects: 2 (e.g., app crashes on login)</li><li>Major defects: 3 (e.g., login fails with incorrect error message)</li><li>Minor defects: 5 (e.g., missing visual element on login screen) </li></ul></li><li>News feed functionality: 15,000 LOC <ul><li>Critical defects: 1 (e.g., news feed crashes after loading)</li><li>Major defects: 4 (e.g., news feed displays outdated information)</li><li>Minor defects: 7 (e.g., typos in news articles)</li></ul></li></ul>



Defect Density Calculation (focusing on critical and major defects):



<ol><li>Overall: <ul><li>Total critical defects: 2 (login) + 1 (news feed) = 3</li><li>Total major defects: 3 (login) + 4 (news feed) = 7</li><li>Total critical &amp; major defects: 3 + 7 = 10</li><li>Total LOC: 10,000 (login) + 15,000 (news feed) = 25,000</li><li>Defect Density = 10 defects / 25,000 LOC = 0.0004 defects/LOC </li></ul></li><li>Per Functionality: <ul><li>Login: (2 critical + 3 major) / 10,000 LOC = 0.0005 defects/LOC</li><li>News feed: (1 critical + 4 major) / 15,000 LOC = 0.00033 defects/LOC</li></ul></li></ol>



Analysis:



<ul><li>The overall defect density (0.0004 defects/LOC) is relatively low, indicating good software quality.</li><li>However, the login functionality has a slightly higher defect density than the news feed.</li><li>This might suggest focusing additional testing efforts on the login functionality, especially considering the critical defects found there.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-uses-of-defect-density">Uses of Defect Density</h2>



Here are the major uses:



<ol><li>Assessing Software Quality: Look at defect density to gauge the number of defects relative to the software size. Lower defect density usually signals better quality. </li><li>Prioritizing Testing Efforts: First, focus your testing on areas with higher defect densities. This ensures the critical parts are solid before anything goes live. </li><li>Monitoring Progress: Keep an eye on defect density over time. It&#8217;s a good indicator of whether your testing strategies are effective and how software quality is evolving. </li><li>Making Release Decisions: Use defect density as one of the factors to decide if a product is ready for release. Remember, the severity of any remaining defects matters too. </li><li>Comparing Teams or Projects: Defect density can help compare software quality across different teams or projects. Remember to factor in the project complexity and industry benchmarks for a fair comparison.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-factors-affecting-defect-density-metrics">Factors Affecting Defect Density Metrics</h2>



Here are some of the factors:



<ol><li>Project Complexity: More complex projects tend to have higher defect densities due to the intricate interactions between different software parts. </li><li>Team Experience and Skill Level: Experienced and skilled teams are generally more adept at producing higher-quality code, resulting in lower defect densities. </li><li>Development Methodology: Agile, DevOps, and similar methodologies incorporating continuous testing and feedback can lead to lower defect densities than traditional waterfall approaches. </li><li>Software Size: Larger software projects might show a different defect density simply because of their size. The metric needs to be interpreted carefully to account for this. </li><li>Testing Coverage and Quality: The extent and thoroughness of testing can significantly impact defect density. More comprehensive testing usually uncovers more defects, potentially raising defect density in the short term but improving overall quality. </li><li>Tool Usage: <a href="https://testsigma.com/qa-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Automated testing tools</a>, static code analysis tools, and other quality assurance technologies can influence defect detection rates and, consequently, defect density. </li><li>Project Phase: Software in earlier development stages may exhibit higher defect densities, typically decreasing as the project matures and more defects are resolved. </li><li>Code Reuse: Projects that leverage a significant amount of well-tested, previously used code may exhibit lower defect densities due to the maturity of the reused components. </li><li>Documentation and Specification Clarity: Clear, detailed requirements and documentation can reduce misunderstandings and errors in implementation, which can affect defect density. </li><li>External Factors: Changes in project scope, tight deadlines, and other external pressures can lead to shortcuts in development and testing, potentially increasing defect density.</li></ol>



Understanding these factors can help interpret defect density metrics more accurately and make informed decisions.



<h2 id="h-advantages-of-defect-density">Advantages of Defect Density</h2>



Defect density, while not without limitations, offers several advantages:



<ul><li>Quantifies Software Quality: It calculates defects relative to software size, allowing for objective comparisons and tracking progress over time.</li><li>Prioritizes Testing Efforts: By identifying areas with higher defect density, teams can focus testing resources on those modules or functionalities most susceptible to issues.</li><li>Improves Development and Testing Processes: Monitoring defect density trends helps assess the effectiveness of current practices. A sustained decrease suggests improvements in development and testing approaches.</li><li>Informs Release Decisions: Defect density can be considered when deciding if the software is ready for release. Lower defect density generally indicates a higher likelihood of a stable and reliable product.</li><li>Benchmarks Progress: By comparing defect density against industry standards or historical data for similar projects, teams can gauge their relative performance and identify areas for potential improvement.</li></ul>



To learn about defect-tracking tools, click <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-tracking-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<h2 id="h-calculate-defect-density-for-test-automation">Calculate Defect Density For Test Automation</h2>



In test automation, you do calculate defect density, but with a slightly different approach than manual testing, mainly because automation has its own unique features.



Here&#8217;s a step-by-step guide on how to calculate defect density for test automation:



<ol><li>Identify the Scope: Determine the scope of your test automation efforts. This could be a specific module, feature, or the entire application.</li><li>Execute Automated Tests: Run your automated test suites against the identified scope. These tests should cover a variety of scenarios to ensure comprehensive coverage.</li><li>Record Defects: As your automated tests run, record any defects or issues identified by the tests. These could be failures, unexpected behavior, or anything that deviates from the expected outcome.</li><li>Count Lines of Code (LOC): Determine the lines of code covered by your automated tests within the scope. This is essential for calculating defect density. You can use tools or scripts to count the lines of code in the tested modules or features.</li><li>Calculate Defect Density: As we discussed before, once you have the total number of defects found and the lines of code covered by your automated tests, you can calculate defect density using the formula:</li></ol>



&nbsp;Defect Density = (Number of Defects Found / Lines of Code Covered) * 1000 



This formula normalizes the defect count per thousand lines of code, providing a standardized measure that can be compared across different modules or projects.



<ol start="6"><li>Analyze and Interpret: After calculating defect density, analyze the results. A higher defect density indicates a higher likelihood of defects within the tested codebase, suggesting lower quality. Conversely, a lower defect density suggests better code quality and fewer defects.</li><li>Iterate and Improve: Use the insights gained from defect density calculations to refine your automated testing strategy. Identify areas where defects are frequently found and prioritize improvements to your tests or the underlying code.</li></ol>



It&#8217;s important to note that while defect density is needed to provide a complete picture of software quality, it should be used with other metrics and qualitative assessments to make informed decisions about the effectiveness of your test automation efforts and the overall quality of your software.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 5x faster with Testsigma, and get to a lower defect density faster
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-summary">Summary<gwmw style="display:none;"></h2>



To summarize, defect density is the ratio of defects found to software size (lines of code, modules). It helps assess software quality—lower density indicates better quality. While useful, it doesn&#8217;t tell the whole story; consider defect severity and use it alongside other quality metrics.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h2 id="h-what-is-a-good-defect-density">What is a good defect density?</h2>



First, there&#8217;s no single &#8220;good&#8221; defect density, as it depends on factors like project complexity and development methodology.&nbsp;



Generally, a lower defect density (e.g., less than 1 defect per thousand lines of code) suggests higher quality, but always consider the severity of remaining defects.



<h2 id="h-what-is-a-normal-defect-rate">What is a normal defect rate?</h2>



A normal defect rate varies based on industry and project complexity but typically ranges from 1 to 5 defects per thousand lines of code in software development.

Defect Density: How To Calculate For Test Automation?

Making sure that all the front-end functionalities of your software application work perfectly is not the only aspect that we should take care of as testers. Because the back end of your software product is the base of everything, this is why webhook testing is very important.&nbsp;



Webhook Testing is an important aspect of <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a> and it helps to ensure effective communication with other applications. Through this article, we are going to discuss what webhook testing is, the types of webhook testing, how to perform a webhook test using Testsigma, and some of the well-known webhook testing tools.<gwmw style="display:none;">



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1600" height="1600" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06140053/unnamed-1-1-1.jpg" alt="Webhook Testing" class="wp-image-50582" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06140053/unnamed-1-1-1.jpg 1600w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06140053/unnamed-1-1-1-300x300.jpg 300w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06140053/unnamed-1-1-1-768x768.jpg 768w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06140053/unnamed-1-1-1-1536x1536.jpg 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" /></figure>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Webhook_Testing">1 What is Webhook Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Types_of_Webhook_Testing">2 Types of Webhook Testing</a><ul><li><a href="#Unit_Testing_Webhooks_for_Logic_Errors">2.1 Unit Testing Webhooks for Logic Errors</a></li><li><a href="#Functional_Testing_of_Webhook_Workflows">2.2 Functional Testing of Webhook Workflows</a></li><li><a href="#Load_Testing_Webhooks_for_Resilience">2.3 Load Testing Webhooks for Resilience</a></li><li><a href="#Profiling_Webhooks_for_Performance_Improvements">2.4 Profiling Webhooks for Performance Improvements</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#How_to_Test_Webhooks">3 How to Test Webhooks?</a><ul><li><a href="#Testing_Webhook_via_Automated_testing_tools">3.1 Testing Webhook via Automated testing tools</a></li><li><a href="#Testing_Webhook_Code_Locally">3.2 Testing Webhook Code Locally</a></li><li><a href="#Testing_Webhook_Delivery">3.3 Testing Webhook Delivery</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Best_Webhooks_Testing_Tools">4 Best Webhooks Testing Tools</a><ul><li><a href="#PostBin">4.1 PostBin</a></li><li><a href="#RequestBin">4.2 RequestBin</a></li><li><a href="#Beeceptor">4.3 Beeceptor</a></li><li><a href="#Ngrok">4.4 Ngrok</a></li><li><a href="#HTTPie">4.5 HTTPie</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">5 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">6 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Can_I_test_webhooks_in_Postman">6.1 Can I test webhooks in Postman?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_API_and_webhook">6.2 What is the difference between API and webhook?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-webhook-testing">What is Webhook Testing?</h2>



Webhook Testing is the process of verifying the functionality and reliability of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webhook" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">webhooks</a>. In case you are wondering what a webhook is, a webhook is a personalized notification that gets activated or triggered by specific events such as user registrations, changes to database records, security alerts, new messages, IoT device triggers, etc. When those events occur, a message is sent to a web server (which is not the one that is hosted for the original web page) using an HTTP POST request. This message may contain the latest real-time data or updates related to the triggered event.<gwmw style="display:none;">



Under webhook testing, testers ensure that the webhook is configured correctly, whether it sends and receives data as expected, and whether it handles various scenarios smoothly such as errors and timeouts. Webhook testing is important for developers to make sure that the respective integrations are correctly done and that the data flow goes between systems with no issues.



<h2 id="h-types-of-webhook-testing">Types of Webhook Testing</h2>



Webhook testing can be divided into four different types. Let’s get to know what they are and why they are so important when ensuring system integration.



<h3 id="h-unit-testing-webhooks-for-logic-errors">Unit Testing Webhooks for Logic Errors</h3>



In this type of webhook testing, testers mainly focus on verifying the individual components or units of the webhook’s logic. Developers check whether each part of the webhook’s code behaves as expected while catching errors or bugs that may occur within the logic of the webhook. This makes sure that the basic components of the webhook work correctly and identifies the potential issues that can occur at the earliest in the software development lifecycle.



<h3 id="h-functional-testing-of-webhook-workflows">Functional Testing of Webhook Workflows</h3>



In this type of webhook testing, testers verify the entire workflow&#8217;s end-to-end functionality. Usually, testers trigger the webhook by executing the respective events, and then they verify whether all the individual tasks starting from the trigger initiation to the response generation, work as expected with no issues. This type of testing ensures that the webhook not only performs individual tasks correctly but also that it integrates smoothly.



<h3 id="h-load-testing-webhooks-for-resilience">Load Testing Webhooks for Resilience</h3>



This sort of webhook testing deals with how a webhook works under high user traffic. There, the testers create a lot of events to evaluate the webhook&#8217;s ability to handle such massive loads while checking that the webhook remains responsive and doesn&#8217;t produce errors or any other types of issues even during the high-usage periods. This type of testing is very important when it comes to finding the performance bottlenecks in the software systems, scalability concerns, and resource limitations such as memory and disc limitations specifically in the performance of specific webhooks.



<h3 id="h-profiling-webhooks-for-performance-improvements">Profiling Webhooks for Performance Improvements</h3>



Under profiling webhooks for performance improvements, testers evaluate the webhooks&#8217; performance and identify all the areas in which the performance should be improved. In addition to that, the testers check different elements of the webhook such as its response time, resource utilization, etc. Developers can identify performance bottlenecks and optimize the code to improve overall efficiency while designing a more reliable webhook by profiling code.



<h2 id="h-how-to-test-webhooks">How to Test Webhooks?</h2>



For some QA engineers, webhook testing can be quite new thus, they might not know how to test webhooks exactly.&nbsp;



<h3 id="h-testing-webhook-via-automated-testing-tools">Testing Webhook via Automated testing tools</h3>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/qa-automation-tools">Automated testing tools</a> evaluate webhooks by simulating triggering events, verifying valid payload structure, and validating HTTP responses and status codes. These tools test proper header handling, and endpoint accessibility, and test retry mechanisms of webhooks. Security checks, including SSL/TLS validation, are performed, while testing also covers timeout handling, redundancy, and failover mechanisms. Apart from that &#8211;&nbsp; logging, error handling, and concurrency testing help to a comprehensive assessment of the application.



<h3 id="h-testing-webhook-code-locally">Testing Webhook Code Locally</h3>



When testing webhook code locally, developers create a separate test environment on their local machines, and with that, they can simulate webhook events and observe how the code responds. First of all, developers set up a testing server to expose their created local server to the internet temporarily. Then they trigger events and monitor the behavior of the webhook code while debugging the issues if there are any. Testing webhook code locally is very important when it comes to executing efficient and fast iterations during the development phase while ensuring that the webhook works correctly before deploying it to the production environments.



<h3 id="h-testing-webhook-delivery">Testing Webhook Delivery</h3>



When testing webhook delivery, testers validate the end-to-end process of delivering webhook payloads. There, they confirm that the webhook is correctly configured to receive and process data. Also, they ensure that the sender can deliver payloads to the configured endpoint with no issues. While testing webhook delivery, testers inspect webhook payloads, verify the HTTP status codes, and analyze response messages using tools. This type of testing helps identify and address any issues related to the webhook&#8217;s communication and data transfer tasks while ensuring reliable and timely delivery of information between systems.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your end-to-end UI tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 5x faster, with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-best-webhooks-testing-tools">Best Webhooks Testing Tools</h2>



Even though the term “webhook testing” is quite new to some people, there are a lot of webhook testing tools in the<a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/"> software quality industry</a> nowadays. Let’s get to know some of the well-known webhook testing tools in the QA field.



<h3 id="h-postbin">PostBin</h3>



PostBin provides users with a publicly accessible endpoint where webhook payloads can be sent to inspect. Developers can observe and analyze the data sent by webhooks, helping to validate the correctness of the payloads and troubleshoot any issues. PostBin is very useful during the development and debugging phases. While supporting multiple data formats, PostBin handles webhook payloads with flexibility.



<h3 id="h-requestbin">RequestBin</h3>



RequestBin is a tool that allows developers to create a public endpoint to inspect HTTP requests and webhook payloads. It provides a visual representation of the data received and makes it easy to identify any errors in the payloads. RequestBin supports both HTTP and HTTPS, and it is a valuable tool for webhook testing and debugging. One of the best benefits of the RequestBin tool is its integration capabilities with third-party tools which helps to work with a lot of development and testing frameworks. Its ability to work with both HTTP and HTTPS protocols makes it easier for developers to work with different development environments.



<h3 id="h-beeceptor">Beeceptor</h3>



Beeceptor is a tool that lets users create custom endpoints to capture, inspect, and debug HTTP requests and webhooks. It offers features such as request logging, response customization, and the ability to simulate different HTTP status codes. Preceptor is very important for testing various aspects of webhook functionality and it makes sure that the integration works as expected. Other than webhook testing, it also helps to prepare applications to simulate real-world scenarios. Beeceptor’s collaborative features are one of the key points which add value to that too and it helps the development teams to share and collaborate on debugging sessions very easily.



<h3 id="h-ngrok">Ngrok</h3>



Ngrok is a tool that creates secure tunnels to localhost, making local web servers accessible over the internet. It is very useful for testing webhooks locally by exposing a local server to a public URL. Ngrok allows developers to receive real payloads in their local environment before deploying to production. This tool can handle multiple different connections and provide real-time analytics and it helps in many ways when it comes to monitoring, controlling and optimizing webhook performance.



<h3 id="h-httpie">HTTPie</h3>



   is a command-line tool that can be used to test webhooks easily. It can be also used for documentation, debugging purposes and to explore dry runs as well. It gives transparency when it comes to parameters sent and the responses that can be received while supporting basic authentication methods. HTTPie is used not only for automation but also to enhance the development workflow by integrating it into CI/CD pipelines. Additionally, it allows the developers to automate and integrate HTTPie into their testing frameworks and development workflows as well.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your end-to-end UI tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 5x faster, with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Knowing how to perform webhook testing is very important when it comes to ensuring reliable communication between web applications. With the support of various webhook testing methods and testing tools, both developers and testers can identify issues in the webhooks and address them accordingly at the earliest. Ultimately, it helps the whole software development team to complete a well-functioning software product.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-can-i-test-webhooks-in-postman">Can I test webhooks in Postman?</h3>



Testing webhooks using Postman is possible. Even though Postman is traditionally used for testing APIs, it provides features for webhook testing as well. Through Postman, you can create and send HTTP requests to simulate webhook events. Also, it helps to inspect the responses and validate the behavior of your webhook. Postman offers a comprehensive environment for developers to evaluate and debug their integrations.



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-api-and-webhook">What is the difference between API and webhook?</h3>



The primary difference between an API and a webhook is the way they communicate between software systems. An API is a set of protocols and tools that allows different software applications to communicate with each other. However, a webhook is a user-defined HTTP POST call that should be triggered by specific events. While APIs enable communication instances between systems, webhooks are more about notifications triggered by specific events.<gwmw style="display:none;">

Webhook Testing | What it is, Types & How to Perform?

Banking Application Testing | What it is & How to Perform?

As organisations continue to adopt Salesforce to streamline operations, having a robust test automation strategy becomes critical to ensure that frequent updates, configurations, and customizations work seamlessly.



Following industry standards for software testing, this case study explores a structured approach to Salesforce test automation, illustrating how automation can enhance quality, reduce regression testing time, and improve resource allocation.



As a seasoned Salesforce test automation engineer, I&#8217;ve had the privilege of witnessing the transformative power of test automation in action. Today, I&#8217;m excited to share a comprehensive case study that showcases the remarkable benefits we were able to achieve through the strategic implementation of a robust test automation framework.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#The_Challenge_Navigating_Complexity_and_Rapid_Change_in_Salesforce">1 The Challenge: Navigating Complexity and Rapid Change in Salesforce</a></li><li><a href="#The_Solution_Comprehensive_Salesforce_Test_Automation">2 The Solution: Comprehensive Salesforce Test Automation</a></li><li><a href="#The_Results_Transforming_Salesforce_Testing_Efficiency_and_Quality">3 The Results: Transforming Salesforce Testing Efficiency and Quality</a></li><li><a href="#Looking_to_the_Future_How_LLMs_Can_Enhance_Salesforce_Test_Automation">4 Looking to the Future: How LLMs Can Enhance Salesforce Test Automation</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigma_for_Automated_Salesforce_Testing">5 Testsigma for Automated Salesforce Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">6 Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-the-challenge-navigating-complexity-and-rapid-change-in-salesforce">The Challenge: Navigating Complexity and Rapid Change in Salesforce</h2>



Our client, a rapidly growing SaaS company, was facing a set of interconnected challenges within their Salesforce ecosystem. As their Salesforce instance grew in complexity, the problems they encountered became increasingly multifaceted and difficult to manage.



Over time, the client&#8217;s Salesforce platform had become more intricate, with a growing number of custom objects, integrations, and business processes. This complexity made it increasingly challenging to maintain a comprehensive understanding of the entire system and its interdependencies.&nbsp;



Additionally, the client&#8217;s Salesforce development team was working at a fast pace, continuously introducing new features and updates to meet the evolving needs of their customers. While this agility was crucial for the business, it also created a constant state of change that made it difficult to ensure the stability and reliability of the Salesforce platform.



The client&#8217;s existing testing approach was heavily reliant on manual processes, which became increasingly time-consuming and error-prone as the Salesforce instance grew in complexity. The QA team struggled to keep up with the rapid development cycles, and they were unable to thoroughly validate all critical business scenarios before each deployment.&nbsp;



The manual testing approach simply could not scale to meet the demands of the client&#8217;s growing Salesforce ecosystem. As the number of test cases and the frequency of deployments increased, the QA team found it increasingly challenging to maintain the necessary testing coverage and ensure the quality of the Salesforce solutions.



These challenges led to delayed time-to-market, as the inefficient testing process and the inability to quickly identify and resolve defects impacted the client&#8217;s ability to deliver new features and updates to their customers. This had a direct impact on their competitive positioning and customer satisfaction.



The leadership team at the client&#8217;s organisation recognized that these challenges were hindering their ability to fully leverage the power of Salesforce and deliver the best possible experience to their customers. They knew that a more efficient and scalable testing approach was needed to overcome these obstacles and position the company for long-term success.



<h2 id="h-the-solution-comprehensive-salesforce-test-automation">The Solution: Comprehensive Salesforce Test Automation</h2>



After a thorough evaluation of the client&#8217;s requirements and the existing Salesforce ecosystem, we proposed a comprehensive test automation strategy. The key elements of this approach were:



<ol><li>Comprehensive Test Suite Development: We worked closely with the client&#8217;s development and quality assurance teams to identify critical business scenarios, integration points, and user journeys. This enabled us to create a robust and comprehensive test suite that covered the core functionality of the Salesforce platform, as well as edge cases and potential areas of concern. </li><li>Automation Framework and Tool Selection: We carefully selected a Salesforce-compatible test automation framework and tool that would seamlessly integrate with the client&#8217;s existing technology stack. This allowed us to leverage the power of automation while maintaining a cohesive and maintainable solution. In this case, we chose a well-established framework that offered advanced features, such as data-driven testing, parallel execution, and detailed reporting. </li><li>Test Automation Implementation: Our team of experienced Salesforce test automation engineers implemented the selected framework and tool, meticulously automating the identified test cases. This process involved developing reusable code modules, creating data-driven test scenarios, and implementing robust error-handling and reporting mechanisms. We also incorporated best practices, such as modular design, code versioning, and continuous improvement, to ensure the long-term maintainability of the automation suite. </li><li>Continuous Integration and Deployment: We integrated the <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/automated-test-suite/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation suite</a> with the client&#8217;s continuous integration and deployment pipelines, enabling seamless and frequent regression testing. This allowed the development team to quickly identify and address any regressions or defects, thereby reducing the time-to-market for new features.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-the-results-transforming-salesforce-testing-efficiency-and-quality">The Results: Transforming Salesforce Testing Efficiency and Quality </h2>



The implementation of the Salesforce test automation strategy yielded remarkable results for our client:



<ol><li>Increased Test Coverage: By automating the critical test cases, we were able to achieve a significant increase in test coverage, ensuring that new features and updates were thoroughly validated before deployment. </li><li>Faster Release Cycles: The automated testing process reduced the time required for regression testing from several days to just a few hours, enabling the client to deliver new features to their customers more quickly and with greater confidence. </li><li>Improved Quality: The consistent and reliable execution of automated tests helped to identify and resolve defects earlier in the development lifecycle, resulting in a higher-quality Salesforce solution for the client&#8217;s customers. </li><li>Cost Savings: The efficiency gains achieved through <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation</a> led to a substantial reduction in the resources required for manual testing, allowing the client to reallocate those resources to other high-impact initiatives.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-looking-to-the-future-how-llms-can-enhance-salesforce-test-automation">Looking to the Future: How LLMs Can Enhance Salesforce Test Automation</h2>



As we look to the future, I believe that the integration of large language models (LLMs) can further enhance the capabilities of Salesforce test automation. LLMs, such as GPT-3, have demonstrated remarkable natural language processing and generation abilities, which can be leveraged to:



<ol><li>Automated Test Case Generation: LLMs can analyse Salesforce requirements and user stories to automatically generate relevant test cases, saving time and ensuring comprehensive coverage. </li><li>Test Case Optimization: LLMs can suggest optimizations to existing test cases, identifying opportunities for consolidation, parameterization, and improved maintenance. </li><li>Natural Language-based Reporting: LLMs can generate detailed, human-readable reports on test execution, including insights and recommendations for improvement, making it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand the testing process. </li><li>Intelligent Automation Assistance: LLMs can provide contextual assistance to test automation engineers, helping with code generation, debugging, and troubleshooting, thereby enhancing the overall productivity and efficiency of the test automation team.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-testsigma-for-automated-salesforce-testing">Testsigma for Automated Salesforce Testing</h2>



Testsigma is a low-code cloud-based GenAI-powered test automation platform that allows testers to<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-salesforce-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> automate Salesforce tests</a> using plain English statements without requiring much coding expertise.



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1440" height="768" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/27160715/Testsigma-Recorder.png" alt="Testsigma-Recorder" class="wp-image-50431" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/27160715/Testsigma-Recorder.png 1440w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/27160715/Testsigma-Recorder-768x410.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px" /></figure>



Some key reasons why Testsigma can be your perfect Salesforce testing tool,



10x Faster: Create Salesforce tests in plain English using NLP-based testing or the Recorder.



No setup required: Create, run, and maintain Salesforce tests on the cloud.



Salesforce environment: Test across Salesforce Developer Sandbox &#8211; Developer Pro, Partial Copy, and Full Sandbox.&nbsp;



Simple interface: Provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making the platform easy to use for both manual and automation testers.



Parallel testing: Run multiple Salesforce tests across different environments simultaneously to reduce execution time.



GenAI-powered testing: Get automated test case and test scenario suggestions in seconds from Copilot, a GenAI test assistant for QA teams, using prompts.



AI-driven test maintenance: Auto-healing helps prevent false test failures and handles complex maintenance challenges.



Continuous testing: Integrate your automated Salesforce tests into your existing CI/CD and DevOps pipeline to test continuously and ship faster.



Real-time test reports: Get comprehensive and actionable test insights after every test run to identify bugs.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your Salesforce tests on the cloud, 10x faster, using Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



In conclusion, this Salesforce test automation case study demonstrates the profound impact that a well-designed and executed test automation strategy can have on the success of a Salesforce-powered business. By harnessing the power of automation, we were able to help our client overcome the challenges of complexity and rapid development, paving the way for greater efficiency, quality, and ultimately, better customer experiences.

Wait a second...Did you try Testsigma?

Wait a second...
Did you try Testsigma?