Today, businesses have a mobile-friendly website, a native or hybrid app that can be downloaded from an app store or a web app that render HTML web pages, APIs that are used to build different user interfaces or all of them. It is important to ensure that the software application works as intended on whichever platform it runs, a mobile platform, desktop or the web.
The choice of choosing what type of application to build depends on the end goals of the business. You may need a mobile, web application or both. 
Ensuring the best user experience on every device that the user owns is critical to the business. Developing the software and verifying that the application type works on all devices and browsers is not easy.
It takes a huge amount of time to manually verify the same functionality works as intended across multiple user interfaces. Manually testing the working on each of these doesn&#8217;t fit your Agile and DevOps strategy.
Continuous Testing is the best approach in such cases and can be best achieved through test automation.&nbsp;Hence, Automated Continuous Testing platforms play a major role in meeting today’s DevOps/Continuous Delivery standards.
Instead of multiple automation testing tools that can automate just one application type, there should be a unified Continuous Testing platform that can automate every application type on all platforms, best in parallel with development.
Let us see some of the important elements needed in a Unified Automated Testing Software for Continuous Testing
<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#A_Unified_Test_Development_Approach">1 A Unified Test Development Approach</a></li><li><a href="#Inbuilt_Test_Management">2 Inbuilt Test Management</a></li><li><a href="#Unified_Test_Execution_Platform">3 Unified Test Execution Platform</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigmas_Unified_Test_Development_Approach">4 Testsigma’s Unified Test Development Approach</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigmas_Unified_inbuilt_Test_Management">5 Testsigma’s Unified inbuilt Test Management</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigmas_Unified_Test_Execution_Platform">6 Testsigma’s Unified Test Execution Platform</a></li><li><a href="#Parallel_Testing">7 Parallel Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Continuous_Testing">8 Continuous Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Continuous_Integration">9 Continuous Integration</a></li><li><a href="#Flexibility_and_Extensibility">10 Flexibility and Extensibility</a></li><li><a href="#Manual_and_Automation_Testing">11 Manual and Automation Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Bottom_Line">12 Bottom Line</a></li></ul></div>
<h2>A Unified Test Development Approach</h2>
The automated continuous testing tool should not demand different skills to automate different applications. Otherwise, you may need multiple resources with collective skills to check each functionality. 
This adds up to the delay in the testing process and an increase in the automation budget and thereby causes a delay in the Return On Investment.
<h2>Inbuilt Test Management</h2>
Most of the times you need to interact with different applications of different types to complete an end-to-end business use case, for instance, applying for a <a href="https://www.wagedayadvance.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">payday loan</a> in a mobile application, verifying the loan application details in the backend from a web portal etc.
Thus it becomes important for all the tests and requirements of different applications and test types to be documented in a single unified automated continuous platform so that all the stakeholders can easily refer to them anytime.
A Unified automated testing software with an inbuilt test management system that can allow to update the tests continuously and help the stakeholders stay up to date on the requirements.
<h2>Unified Test Execution Platform</h2>
There is a new OS and version release made every day. 
Taking into account the number of possible device combinations, it becomes increasingly difficult for teams to test multiple test environments manually. Additionally, setting up and maintaining of all required resources demand huge time and expense.
It is necessary to check the functioning of every application in each of these device and browser combinations. This is rather complex considering the speed at which application builds are released today.
Testing the same application features on a different device would require many tools to automate. There is no one tool that can automate the application across the various device/OS/browser combinations that the application is intended to run.
A unified, extendable and secure Continuous Testing Platform is essential to help testers connect thousands of web, mobile devices with different device configurations, in one go.
<a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> is a unified automated testing software for web, mobile apps and APIs which allows to create and execute reliable test cases on multiple OS/Device/Browser execution configurations.


<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Speed up Continuous Testing 10X across your Release Pipeline with Testsigma. No coding required. 
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>


<h2>Testsigma’s Unified Test Development Approach</h2>
Testsigma uses a unified<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/natural-language-processing-nlp-based-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> simple natural language</a> approach to automate testing for all application types.
Since there is no technical barrier, this approach increases participation in Test Automation from everyone who can contribute including SMEs and QA Analysts.
Inputs from a combined collaboration of cross-functional teams with diverse skills help in improving the quality of software. Using simple natural language grammar statements to automate even the most complex scenarios, the participation is now not limited to automation testers.
<h2>Testsigma’s Unified inbuilt Test Management</h2>
Inbuilt Test Management to track all the requirements and manage multiple application types within your automation testing tool.
Every change needs to be identified and checked to see if maintenance is required. As changes in the application increases, maintenance efforts further increases.
With in-built test management all the you can notify the changes in requirements automatically to the entire team and do the necessary changes to the tests if required.
<h2>Testsigma’s Unified Test Execution Platform</h2>
Testsigma comes with 1000+ OS/Browser/Version combos and 2000+ real mobile devices of both Android and iOS operating systems.
<a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> provides an extended support for a wide range of mobile, web applications and API services and can run manual/automated tests on iOS, Android and Windows platforms across various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers to ensure that a software works as planned.
<h2><a href="https://testsigma.com/parallel-test-runs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Parallel Testing</a></h2>
Parallel testing has emerged as a way for testers run the same scripts in multiple environments concurrently, allowing them to increase test coverage while cutting down execution time.
Through parallel testing, the test scripts can run the same test over and again on different machines any number of times.
<a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> also provides access to thousands of execution configurations on cloud for parallel testing. This allows for faster feedback and rapid development and delivery cycles.
<h2>Continuous Testing</h2>
Continuous Testing determines if the software is ready to enter the delivery pipeline. Each build committed by the developers is continuous tested, integrated and tested again to find possible business risks at a very early stage. 
This supports and optimizes the widely-used methodologies of continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD) that provides fast feedback. 
Read more on <a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://dzone.com/articles/continuous-testing-for-agile-and-devops-using-test" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Continuous Testing at the speed of Agile and DevOps</a>.
<h2>Continuous Integration</h2>
Automation Testing should be integrated with Continuous Integration tools to run automatically once the build is ready. It is necessary to identify the right tests to run automatically on every build and if a test may fail, the results have to be integrated back into the pipeline triggering a failed build. 
<a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> offers multiple integrations with CI tools to streamline your continuous testing process.
<h2>Flexibility and Extensibility</h2>
There might be a need to scale up or down the resources with quick adjustments to suit changing business needs. Testsigma provides access to thousands of resources available on the cloud with provisions to restrain or accommodate more.
<h2>Manual and Automation Testing</h2>
Though there is a <a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://www.utest.com/articles/why-shift-from-manual-to-automation-testing-for-continuous-delivery" target="_blank" rel="noopener">need to shift from Manual to Automation Testing</a>, there are certain areas that need to be manually tested and you may want to choose a tool that provides specific support for manual tests as well, 
Testsigma unites manual, automated testing in one.
Testsigma is a single platform that brings all resources together for better management and increased test coverage for faster results with near zero initial time and efforts.
Testsigma has an inbuilt ecosystem of all the essential requisites of Test Automation allowing the testing of Web, Mobile and Web services anytime, anywhere!


<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Test an app&#8217;s compatibility across 3000+ platforms, OS, and browser combinations for mobile and web devices with Testsigma.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>


<h2>Bottom Line</h2>
The success of DevOps is dependent on not just test automation, a tight feedback loop, and the right set of tools is important. A <a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-testing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unified automated testing software for continuous testing </a>that supports multiple application types and allows for cross browser/OS/device executions for both manual and automation testing is necessary.

Why Unified Automated Testing Software for Continuous Testing in Agile and DevOps.

Why Unified Automation Testing tool for Continuous Testing in DevOps

Continuous Testing in DevOps is a critical component that helps organizations deliver software quickly without compromising quality. DevOps is a way of working that combines tools, processes, and teams to make it easier and faster to deliver applications and services. To make sure everything works properly, you have to test it all the time. This means running tests before every release so that there are fewer errors and problems. To do this, you need an automated system for testing (called a deployment pipeline).&nbsp;



In DevOps, everything is about being “continuous,” – meaning doing something repeatedly. This blog post discusses why continuous testing is vital in DevOps and how it can help your organization reach its goals. 



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Continuous_Testing_in_DevOps">1 What is Continuous Testing in DevOps?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_We_Need_Continuous_Testing_in_DevOps">2 Why We Need Continuous Testing in DevOps?</a></li><li><a href="#How_does_Continuous_Testing_Play_a_Vital_Role_in_DevOps">3 How does Continuous Testing Play a Vital Role in DevOps?</a></li><li><a href="#What_are_the_Benefits_of_Continuous_Testing_in_DevOps">4 What are the Benefits of Continuous Testing in DevOps?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Prepare_Teams_for_Executing_Continuous_Testing_in_DevOps">5 How to Prepare Teams for Executing Continuous Testing in DevOps?</a></li><li><a href="#Extending_Test_Automation_Towards_Continuous_Testing_at_DevOps_Speed">6 Extending Test Automation Towards Continuous Testing at DevOps Speed</a></li><li><a href="#Continuous_Testing_at_the_Speed_of_Agile_and_DevOps_using_Testsigma">7 Continuous Testing at the Speed of Agile and DevOps using Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">8 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">9 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Why_is_continuous_testing_important_for_DevOps">9.1 Why is continuous testing important for DevOps?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-continuous-testing-in-devops">What is Continuous Testing in DevOps?</h2>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous Testing</a>&nbsp;executes automated tests as part of the software delivery pipeline to obtain immediate feedback on the execution results and business risks associated with a software release candidate.&nbsp;This testing is a way of quickly and reliably getting your software out. It’s all about testing your software as much as possible from the start of development to when it’s ready to be released. This helps teams get feedback quicker, ensure accurate results, and save time on maintaining tests and avoiding false positives. This testing means running tests triggered by the development environment or developers/testers so that you can check requirements from bottom-up user stories to system requirements faster.&nbsp;



<h2 id="why-we-need-continuous-testing-in-devops">Why We Need Continuous Testing in DevOps?</h2>



It promotes automating tests wherever possible through the development cycle. This helps QA teams to evaluate the code quality and the overall software quality at every stage. Apart from that, it helps with the following, too,



<ul><li>Helps identify issues early in the development cycle</li><li>Reduce testing bottlenecks</li><li>Reduce bugs that might slip through production</li><li>Increases time to market</li><li>Speeds up the feedback loops and software delivery</li><li>Fosters collaboration between teams</li></ul>



<h2 id="how-does-continuous-testing-play-a-vital-role-in-devops">How does Continuous Testing Play a Vital Role in DevOps?</h2>



It is an integral part of DevOps that helps make sure you get high-quality software fast. With DevOps, developers and operations teams often work together to release software updates with fewer mistakes.



<ul><li>This checks each step of the development process, like writing code, combining different parts of the program, testing it out, and putting it into use.</li><li>This helps teams find problems quickly, so they don’t have to do a lot of rework or miss customer needs.</li><li>This also uses automated tools and systems to test new software quickly and accurately so teams can release their product quickly while still keeping it high quality.</li></ul>



<h2 id="what-are-the-benefits-of-continuous-testing-in-devops">What are the Benefits of Continuous Testing in DevOps?</h2>



Continuous Testing is a vital part of DevOps that helps ensure your software is of good quality. It does this by running tests through the process of making the software. This means mistakes or problems can be found and fixed quickly, saving time and money. Plus, it makes sure that you get a great user experience! By using Continuous Testing as part of DevOps, teams can work together better, become more productive, get their products to market faster, and have higher-quality software overall.



Early Detection of Defects:



It helps find bugs in the early stages of software development so developers can handle problems quickly and easily.



Improved Software Quality:



It ensures that your software meets all the quality standards, so there will be fewer problems and mistakes. That way, your experience with the software will be better.



Faster Time-to-Market:



It helps companies move faster when releasing new features and user updates. It ensures that any changes or additions get out quickly and without problems.



Increased Efficiency:



It automates the testing process and frees up developers’ time to focus on other tasks, increasing productivity and efficiency.



Better Collaboration:



It helps developers, testers, and operations teams work better together, which leads to more talking and better ways of making software.



Reduced Costs:



It can help save money when developing software. By finding problems early on, you can stop them from turning into bigger issues. This means you won’t have to spend as much time and resources trying to fix bigger problems.



From Passed or Failed and Yes or No



<div class="block block-paragraph" data-block="true" data-editor="dngb5" data-offset-key="cr2n9-0-0">
<div class="public-DraftStyleDefault-block public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr" data-offset-key="cr2n9-0-0">Delivery speed is essential, but ensuring users have the best experience possible key. That&#8217;s why businesses test their software in real-world situations to ensure it works properly and can be released without problems. Getting feedback from different teams and ensuring everything is reliable are also really important for testing so the quality of the software stays high. Every change made to the software has to be tested before it can be used, which is part of the Continuous Delivery process. It would take too long to look through all the test automation results, so it&#8217;s easier if a continuous testing platform could automatically give a Yes or No answer about whether it&#8217;s safe to release the product.</div>
</div>



<div class="block block-paragraph" data-block="true" data-editor="dngb5" data-offset-key="1egvn-0-0">
<div data-offset-key="1egvn-0-0">&nbsp;</div>
<div class="public-DraftStyleDefault-block public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr" data-offset-key="1egvn-0-0">If you want to ensure your release candidate is good quality, you need a platform that can automatically check all the necessary things like user <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/acceptance-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">acceptance tests</a> and system requirements. Then it can analyze potential problems before they happen and even fix them. Finally, it will give you an actionable result of Yes or No to decide if it&#8217;s ready to move forward in the delivery pipeline.</div>
</div>



<h2 id="how-to-prepare-teams-for-executing-continuous-testing-in-devops">How to Prepare Teams for Executing Continuous Testing in DevOps?</h2>



Incorporating a continuous testing model can be a bit challenging if your team is new to these methodologies. Below is the guide that will help teams get ready for this testing:



<ul><li>Identify and understand critical integrations in user workflows to design a continuous integration testing framework.</li><li>Ensure the team is familiar with traditional and modern test automation tools or frameworks.</li><li>Push an automated smoke test in the CI build process.</li><li>Create regression suites and integrate them into the CI pipeline.</li><li>Perform smoke and regression tests on multiple virtual environments and machines.</li><li>Automate testing wherever possible and incorporate them into the CI/CD pipeline.</li><li>Optimize test cases incorporated with <a href="https://testsigma.com/tools/continuous-testing-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">continuous testing tools</a> to improve quality and speed.</li><li>Use containers or virtualization to replicate production environments.</li><li>Prioritize API testing over GUI, as GUI testing is slower and requires more time.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-extending-test-automation-towards-continuous-testing-at-devops-speed">Extending Test Automation Towards Continuous Testing at DevOps Speed</h2>



This testing is the process of doing automated tests as part of making software. An end-to-end test automation plan helps companies check their work early, often and quickly, at every step in creating a program so that developers can put it out faster. In Continuous Delivery, any change to the software is ready for release and keeps moving from Development to Testing until it’s ready to be used. To make this testing happen, automated testing needs to be done right from the start when you’re making the product and not just before it’s released.&nbsp;Every time a change is made to the code, it should be sent to the developers quickly. This way, they can see if the update is safe or too risky to be released. Test Automation is necessary for this testing and ensuring everything runs smoothly with each release. It’s part of Agile and other essential things like testing processes, teams, and culture changes.&nbsp;



<h2 id="h-continuous-testing-at-the-speed-of-agile-and-devops-using-testsigma">Continuous Testing at the Speed of Agile and DevOps using Testsigma</h2>



Rapid releases of working software help in gathering user feedback early and help improve the quality of the end product to a great degree. Any new feature can be released quickly to gain feedback by testing the responsiveness of the end user for quicker resolution of failures.



Successful <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/continuous-delivery/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous Delivery</a> process results into shortened iterations, minimized risks, reduced costs, and accelerated time to market by frequent releases.



Automation is not enough to ensure this testing. A combined effort from cross-functional teams is required to collaborate to automate the continuous testing process at DevOps speed.



Testsigma, a unified continuous testing platform is among the best tools that supports automated testing for multiple application types and executes numerous complex tests on multiple devices both local and on cloud with different configurations providing a good test coverage and immediate actionable feedback at DevOps speed.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Speed up Continuous Testing 10X across your Release Pipeline with Testsigma. No coding required. 

</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>







<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Continuous Testing is a key part of DevOps ensuring your software works well. It helps you find problems early, get feedback faster, and make things more efficient – all while keeping costs down. To make sure this testing works quickly and easily with Agile and DevOps, organizations should use automation tools like Testsigma. Testsigma is an online <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-continuous-testing-platform" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous Testing platform</a> that lets you create and run tests without writing code. It also works across different devices and browsers, so you can be sure your software is top quality!



Testsigma can help you speed up software development and ensure your software’s quality is top-notch. It makes Continuous Testing in DevOps easier, so you can get your product out faster. Consider using Testsigma as your automation testing tool to get the most out of it!



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Test an app&#8217;s compatibility across 3000+ platforms, OS, and browser combinations for mobile and web devices with Testsigma.

</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="why-is-continuous-testing-important-for-devops">Why is continuous testing important for DevOps?</h3>



Continuous Testing is key to making DevOps work. It helps ensure the software you’re building is up to scratch by running tests through the development process. This means problems can be spotted quickly, meaning faster feedback and better collaboration between everyone involved. Plus, it helps keep costs down and improve quality so that you can get your product out there faster! Continuous Testing in DevOps is a great way for organizations to streamline their development process and deliver their software faster with higher quality.

Continuous Testing in DevOps – What it is &  Benefits

We are happy to announce that Testsigma is teaming up with Sauce Labs as part of the Technology Alliance Partner(TAP) program. Now you will be able to use the Sauce Labs platform directly from Testsigma!
<a class="brand-color" href="https://saucelabs.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener rel=">Sauce Labs</a>, an award-winning Continuous Testing Cloud ensures your favourite mobile apps and websites work flawlessly on every browser, operating system, and device and deliver a flawless digital experience.
<a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> is an AI-driven Continuous Testing platform with a Shift-Left approach for web and mobile dependent businesses that matches today&#8217;s Agile and DevOps methodologies.
With the TAP program, Sauce Labs and Testsigma can together make it easier for enterprises to leverage automation testing strategies such as continuous testing, continuous integration and continuous delivery to shorten software lifecycles, improve quality and service levels and reduce operational costs.
 As cloud-native companies, our partnership offers a unique opportunity to turn automation testing, services into actionable insights and better business outcomes.
The Sauce Labs Technology Alliance Partnership (TAP) program will provide greater value to customers as we jointly develop integrations to enhance our Continuous Testing capabilities and makes it easier to integrate and use Testsigma more effectively and increase the test coverage while reducing the feedback time in faster delivery cycles.
With the integrated solution, enterprises can now test their applications autonomously on the Sauce Labs Continuous Testing cloud, accelerating their time to value, shortening release cycles, improving quality coverage, and lowering the total cost of quality. 
They can improve their continuous integration and delivery initiatives, increase developer productivity, and reduce infrastructure costs for software teams of all sizes.
“The joint offering allows users to fully and continuously test applications at the speed business demands, without spending millions of dollars on packaged solutions and reskilling their testing org.&#8221;
Enterprises often require automation testing services, needing responsive, flexible and often custom solutions. With this new partnership, stakeholders will have more options to address their specific situation, leveraging Sauce Labs’ progressive technology and Testsigma’s extensive automation testing expertise.
With several members worldwide, the Sauce Labs Technology Alliance Partner program includes technology partners with the shared goal to bring the best expertise and business solutions for each unique customer environment.
Learn more about the Technology Alliance Partner program, at <a href="https://saucelabs.com/company/partners/technology-alliance-program">https://saucelabs.com/company/partners/technology-alliance-program</a>
<a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> is excited to be one among the selected partners to work with the customers to enjoy the full benefits of automated testing!
About Testsigma: 
An AI-driven Continuous Testing platform on cloud, Testsigma lets web and mobile dependent businesses to test releases continuously with a Shift-Left approach that matches today’s Agile and DevOps speed.
<a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learn more about Testsigma</a> 
<a class="brand-color" href="https://twitter.com/testsigmainc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Connect with us on Twitter!</a> 
<a class="brand-color" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/testsigma/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Connect with us on LinkedIn!</a>

Testsigma joins the Sauce Labs Partner program

Testsigma joins the Sauce Labs Technology Alliance Partner (TAP) program

Test Automation has become an immediate requirement for every engineering team to match the pace of continuous delivery. On the other hand, it can also become a waste of time, money and resources if the test automation strategy and your Test Automation tool is not a fit for your requirements.
Generally, when teams <a class="brand-color" href="https://www.utest.com/articles/why-shift-from-manual-to-automation-testing-for-continuous-delivery" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">shift from Manual Testing to Test Automation</a>, they tend to look for the simplest and easiest solutions to get started. Record and playback tools are one of the options a lot of managers consider.
Near zero initial time and programming knowledge are some presumed advantages of choosing record and playback tools. The general perception is that initial investment of time and effort using these tools. But time and again it is being proved that such tools do not work well to meet enterprise-class test automation requirements.
However, it is agreed that these tools are not suitable for test automation if you have a user interface that constantly undergo changes. 
Tests created using Record and Playback tools are often outdated for even a small change in the application. You need to re-record all of the tests or you end up spending a lot of time editing tests.
<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Getting_Started">1 Getting Started</a></li><li><a href="#Why_is_it_difficult_to_generate_stable_tests_easily_with_Record_and_Playback_tools">2 Why is it difficult to generate stable tests easily with Record and Playback tools?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_does_it_fail_to_handle_Dynamic_ObjectsElements">3 Why does it fail to handle Dynamic Objects/Elements?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_can8217t_Record_and_Playback_tools_avoid_maintenance_for_small_UI_changes">4 Why can&#8217;t Record and Playback tools avoid maintenance for small UI changes?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_do_these_tools_not_support_Shift-Left_Testing">5 Why do these tools not support Shift-Left Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#How_Record_and_Playback_tools_fail_to_maintain_a_shared_Element_Repository_to_reduce_maintenance">6 How Record and Playback tools fail to maintain a shared Element Repository to reduce maintenance?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_record_and_then_edit_doesn8217t_work">7 Why record and then edit doesn&#8217;t work?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_isn8217t_Re-record_an_option">8 Why isn&#8217;t Re-record an option?</a></li><li><a href="#So_where_do_Record_and_Playback_tools_fit">9 So, where do Record and Playback tools fit?</a></li></ul></div>
<h2>Getting Started</h2>
Many teams shifting from manual to automation might look at Record and Playback tools as the test scripts are created automatically for every action that a functional tester performs manually.
These scripts can be easily re-run to test the same functionality provided the application does not change.
It may seem easy and compelling but requires a lot of rework and changes. The system generated scripts or tests are hard to understand and maintain. 
We will look more into this in detail.
<h2>Why is it difficult to generate stable tests easily with Record and Playback tools?</h2>
It&#8217;s been proved that these tools would fail to generate stable and reliable tests for enterprise-class applications that has complex scenarios with dynamic data.
A lot of manual revisions are required to make the script generated by Record and Playback tools to be stable and production-ready like editing test data and element information, adding assertions, conditional statements, handling dynamic data etc.
Also, you cannot record all the steps for dynamic enterprise-class applications. You may need to add custom actions, assertions and, dynamic steps manually.
Record and Playback tools would record both necessary and unwanted steps automatically. The recorded steps would not be as per your business documents.
Quite often, for the same action, more than one copy of the same script is generated multiple times and the tester has to identify which copy of the script requires editing. It’s difficult to understand what part of the code belongs to the test steps, what is the exact data the tool collects that needs change.
A lot of time is spent cleaning unnecessary data to make the tests reusable and readable and in-line with your business documents/process.
Maintaining test scripts would be a complex task with a lot of duplicate and disorganized elements making your tests very difficult to understand and maintain.
AI &amp; ML can be helpful to maintain these tests for basic element attribute changes. But in reality, there can be more than just element attribute changes. 
There may be layout changes, design changes etc. in which case these duplicate elements requires a lot of maintenance work from developers.
The alternate approach would be to re-record all the steps from the beginning. However, this demands huge effort having to go through the entire process over and again. And, you may lose the test history.
Identifying the problem area first from the huge script that is auto-generated, making edits to the code and fixing them is a tough task. 
The time required to manually test an application vs the time to repair the recorded steps or re-record is relatively less.
The time saved getting started with the application testing is wasted editing and re-recording every time there is change. 

<h2>Why does it fail to handle Dynamic Objects/Elements?</h2>
Most of the modern applications are built with dynamic elements with no unique attributes. In such cases, record and playback tools rely on HTML element hierarchy/absolute paths which is the most unstable and unreliable approach to build automated tests.
These tests fail during subsequent re-runs, as the attributes of these dynamic elements change every time.
The ability to define dynamic element paths as part of element repository is required to handle these cases, which is missing in record and playback tools.
Also, these steps fail even for the slightest change in the application (not just the element attributes) and are not always dependable.
<h2>Why can&#8217;t Record and Playback tools avoid maintenance for small UI changes?</h2>
The slightest change in the recorded element or any element on the page can break the recorded tests easily.
Many of today&#8217;s testing tools capture more than just the required attributes to identify a particular element. This way, whenever there is a change in any one of these attributes, any of the remaining attributes can be used to identify those elements.
This has become a standard practice in many Test Automation tools. The approach is required to address some of the maintenance issues with element attribute changes. Some of the Test Automation tools like <a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Testsigma</a> use AI to create paths dynamically using the recorded attributes.
<a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Testsigma</a> not just uses the Dynamic Locator Strategy on element attributes but also takes into account the attributes of siblings and parent elements to solve this maintenance issue better!
Many a time, there would be more than just element attributes changes. These tools should consider the parent and sibling attributes of a particular element to ensure that the tests won’t break easily.
<h2>Why do these tools not support Shift-Left Testing?</h2>
It is essential to start the test automation process, early on, with the Agile and DevOps methodologies demanding faster, frequent software product releases. If testing cannot keep up with these modern approaches to ensure continuous software development and delivery, the goal is not fully achieved.
With these tools, you cannot start your Test Automation until you have a stable UI to automate.
Because of this either Test Automation will be pushed out of delivery pipeline or takes more time to release your quality products. Both these options are not acceptable for current fast-paced Agile and Continuous Delivery practices. 
<a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-tool-ready-for-shift-left/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Is your test automation tool ready for Shift Left testing?</a>


<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup required.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>


<h2>How Record and Playback tools fail to maintain a shared Element Repository to reduce maintenance?</h2>
Whatever may be the approach, test maintenance is a continuous effort and plays a major role in automation success. Maintaining elements is highly important for test maintenance.
Record and playback tools generates a lot of duplicate elements as explained earlier and do not reuse the elements that are already available. This increases the need for test maintenance with the need to manage multiple instances of the same element.
The tools are expected to be smart enough to reuse the element if it is already recorded. None of the record and playback tools address this.
<h2>Why record and then edit doesn&#8217;t work?</h2>
Recorded test steps are not always stable and are not reusable by default and can break as the application code changes.
The recommended approach is to either edit these steps manually or re-record the entire test again.
To edit a recorded test you need to first understand the system generated test completely, then decide on what to change and how to change. This requires programming knowledge and constant reviewing. Without this, for every change in the application, these tests will continue to fail.
But the fact is that editing an automatically generated script is more difficult and time consuming compared to many programming based tools. 
Manually testing the same feature end to end takes less time and effort compared to editing these tests every time.
The purpose of Test Automation is to allow the automated tests to run unattended. On the contrary, testers are expected to sit through the whole of the execution process and find problem areas by looking them up manually and make changes to the generated code/test steps continuously. 
The test automation efforts go in vain as testers eventually shift back to Manual Testing.
<h2>Why isn&#8217;t Re-record an option?</h2>
An alternative to maintaining these tests is re-recording. 
 Re-recording the whole of the application for minor changes is not very convenient especially for large applications. 
The QA team has to go through the entire process of re-recording and editing the tests to make them stable and reliable.
Considering all the effort needed after recording, like editing, clean-up, etc., Re-recording is not an affordable solution for bigger teams who practice Agile and Continuous Delivery methodologies.
<h2>So, where do Record and Playback tools fit?</h2>
Record and playback tools can be considered for small static applications whose application code and UI does not change frequently.
 It would be appealing to the management to introduce the concept of Test Automation, what and how can be automated and how much time can be saved through Test Automation once the automated tests are in place.&nbsp;
The better approach would be test automation with the same simplicity of record and playback tools along with enterprise-class flexibility and stability.
Check out <a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/alternative-to-record-and-playback-tools-for-enterprise-class-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">an alternative to record and playback tools for enterprise-class Test Automation</a>


<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>

Why is Record and Playback not suitable for enterprise-class Test Automation?

Modern delivery practices, from Agile to DevOps to Continuous Delivery, have changed the way software is being delivered. Software releases occur on a daily basis, and the testing process should begin as early as the requirements specification and planning phase to keep up. But there are always many challenges in testing that you would come across before you shorten the testing cycle.



<cta-banner title="Get started on your low-code web application testing journey today" description="Summa" anchor-text="Start Free Trial" cta-url="/request-demo">
</cta-banner>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Manual_Testing">1 What is Manual Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Major_Challenges_in_Manual">2 Major Challenges in Manual</a><ul><li><a href="#1_Gap_between_dev_complete_and_test_complete">2.1 1. Gap between dev complete and test complete</a></li><li><a href="#2_Increased_Cost_Time_and_Resources">2.2 2. Increased Cost, Time and Resources</a></li><li><a href="#3_Difficult_to_cope_with_changes">2.3 3. Difficult to cope with changes</a></li><li><a href="#4_Errors_due_to_mistakes">2.4 4. Errors due to mistakes</a></li><li><a href="#5_Lack_of_real_or_close_to_real_Test_Environments">2.5 5. Lack of real or close to real Test Environments</a></li><li><a href="#6_Less_Test_Coverage">2.6 6. Less Test Coverage</a></li><li><a href="#7_Less_Collaboration">2.7 7. Less Collaboration</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#And_Hence_Test_Automation">3 And Hence Test Automation.</a></li><li><a href="#Why_is_there_a_Retreat_to_Begin_Test_Automation">4 Why is there a Retreat to Begin Test Automation?</a><ul><li><a href="#1nbspThe_major_reason_would_be_the_need_for_programming_skills">4.1 1.&nbsp;The major reason would be the need for programming skills.</a></li><li><a href="#2_Test_Automation_demands_the_usage_of_several_tools">4.2 2. Test Automation demands the usage of several tools</a></li><li><a href="#3_Insufficient_test_reports">4.3 3. Insufficient test reports</a></li><li><a href="#4_Gradual_ROI">4.4 4. Gradual ROI</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">5 Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="what-is-manual-testing"><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/manual-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What is Manual Testing?</a></h2>



It is a type of testing that involves checking the application against user requirements manually without the use of any automation tools. Testers perform the validation process by creating manual test cases and executing them by themselves. It is the go-to approach to testing for a long time, but it is a tedious process when the test cycles repeat frequently.As we understand, It is not the best testing approach to match the pace of Agile development and <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/continuous-delivery/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous Delivery</a>. In such short cycles, it is difficult to test every feature of the application manually.Let’s discuss some of the major challenges in manually testing an application:



Let’s discuss some of the major challenges in manually testing an application:



<h2 id="major-challenges-in-manual-testing">Major Challenges in Manual</h2>



As we know, it covers multiple aspects of an application, but it comes with its fair share of problems. It is time-consuming, requires major resource planning, and is prone to human errors as well. Here are some of the challenges in testing for you to get a better understanding of the process:



<h3 id="1-gap-between-dev-complete-and-test-complete">1. Gap between dev complete and test complete</h3>



The most critical tail back in ensuring the continuous delivery of software is caused by a delay to start.



Testing of an application that starts when development completes, impacts the continuous delivery cycle. Inadequate traditional test practises and testing tools adopted compounds to this.



It is never enough to emphasize on the fact that Testing should be involved at the initial stages of the SDLC best, in parallel with development. Immediate feedback and an increased collaboration will enhance the quality of the software.



<h3 id="2-increased-cost-time-and-resources">2. Increased Cost, Time and Resources</h3>



The testing team must comprise a group of enduring testers. The manual approach can be quite repetitive and the testers need to work under pressure to meet the delivery time. This requires the participation of a large number of manual testers scrutinizing every feature of the application on each device it is intended to run with a great deal of attention. This process can be time consuming with a large number of test cases being tested by hand. The cost involved in testing a software manually increases with increasing time and application size. To ensure that the continuous delivery needs of a large application is met, a huge number of manual testers and resources would be required.



<h3 id="3-difficult-to-cope-with-changes">3. Difficult to cope with changes</h3>



It is not the best option for applications that are intended for long term. Such applications may undergo a lot of updates and enhancements continuously. Having to check all of these changes on every device, repeatedly for the same and different release each time is tedious and time consuming.



 With the variety of device configurations available now, it would be rather difficult to check the working on each of these while delivering software continuously.



<h3 id="4-errors-due-to-mistakes">4. Errors due to mistakes</h3>



We are bound to make mistakes and there’s no denying that. An error left unnoticed can escape into further stages and impact the quality of the application. The accuracy of scripted test results is more in less time compared to Manual.



 As testers repeat the same tests many times there is a good chance of missing out a few things. There wouldn’t be enough time to fix these errors during continuous software delivery.



<h3 id="5-lack-of-real-or-close-to-real-test-environments">5. Lack of real or close to real Test Environments</h3>



Another important issue is with test environments. It is necessary to ensure that the actual test environment is provided to testers to cover all possible errors that may occur at the user’s end.



Manual Testers need to manually check for compatibility and other possible errors in all the device/OS/browser combinations. Considering the multitude of device configurations and orientations available today, this is a rather difficult and time-consuming task. Also, setting up these <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-environment/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test environments</a> manually for each tester is not easy.



<h3 id="6-less-test-coverage">6. Less Test Coverage</h3>



Errors that appear on a single platform can only be checked at a time. Quite often, manual testers may miss out on a few test cases and this can affect the overall coverage of the tests.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Coverage </a>



<h3 id="7-less-collaboration">7. Less Collaboration</h3>



There is a need for cross-functional collaborative teams that shares process updates as testing progresses. An agile team must ensure the participation of multiple testers across teams at any time. With huge test cases that needs to be manually tested, there may not be enough time for collaboration efforts across different teams.



Immediate feedback will help the developers make quick error fixes and save time. Practising Testing in Agile and CD model is practically infeasible.



It can be a bottleneck which requires tremendous testing effort. To ensure faster, continuous delivery of quality software with lesser ROI payback time, manual is not enough.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Checkout how Testsigma&#8217;s addresses all these challenges
@ no additional cost, resources and time.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Sign up now</a>
</div>



<h2 id="and-hence-test-automation">And Hence Test Automation.</h2>



Today, the software industry has accepted the fact that Test Automation is a better replacement for Manual.



Functional Testers manually go through every feature of the application on each device/OS/ browsers, try out all possible input combinations, compare and document the outcome with the expected one, manually, each time. This is rather time consuming.



It is hardly the case that a set of programmed (automated) scripts miss out on some tests. Test Automation scripts need only be written once and can be executed any number of times repeatedly.



 Test Automation is best suited for testing such reusable units, especially when the application undergoes a lot of updates and enhancements and retesting is required. Hence, it is best suited to match the modern Agile and Continuous Delivery practices.



However, a sudden shift towards <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Automation </a>can be a bit overwhelming for functional testers. The Test Automation tool being adopted should allow for a smooth transition from Manual to Test Automation.



<h2 id="why-is-there-a-retreat-to-begin-test-automation">Why is there a Retreat to Begin Test Automation?</h2>



<h3 id="1-the-major-reason-would-be-the-need-for-programming-skills">1.&nbsp;The major reason would be the need for programming skills.</h3>



Test Automation demands programming knowledge and depending on the application, would require expertise in multiple languages and technologies.



A test automation tool like <a class="brand-color" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Testsigma</a> is easy for just anyone. It allows Manual testers to take charge of test automation with no additional programming knowledge. The test scripts are developed using simple natural language and involves no complex coding.



<h3 id="2-test-automation-demands-the-usage-of-several-tools">2. Test Automation demands the usage of several tools</h3>



To automate each application type, different sets of tools might be required. Integrations with Bug tracking and Reporting tools, CI/CD tools, <a href="https://testsigma.com/test-management-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Management tools</a>, etc are all necessary to automate tests to enable Continuous Delivery.



One tool that suffices every application type hardly exist. It is required to set up all of these tools before getting started. The time and cost involved to set up and ramp up the test automation process is huge.



Testsigma provides all the essential components and necessary integrations with external tools to ensure Continuous Delivery.



<h3 id="3-insufficient-test-reports">3. Insufficient test reports</h3>



The Test Automation tool should provide a detailed report on the test runs, more than just Passed/Failed for better troubleshooting. A share detailed failure report with cross-links to rectify the errors is essential.



 The actionable results provided by Testsigma’s AI strategy indicates what when and why failed and identifies other tests which may as well be affected and tries auto-correcting these affected automated tests. Thus, potential failures can be identified upfront and a lot of effort, execution time and cost is saved.



<h3 id="4-gradual-roi">4. Gradual ROI</h3>



As the demand to continuously deliver applications faster increases, one may need to do effective planning to create test runs faster and achieve better ROI.



It involves several requisites and a huge initial investment to get started. However, Test Automation efforts in <a href="https://continuousdelivery.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Continuous Delivery</a> would pay off as effective ROI, but only gradually due to huge initial time, high set-up resource cost, and need for continuous maintenance.



<a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a> saves time and maintenance efforts to create reliable tests with well-managed test data. There are no requisites for getting started, and there’s no long wait needed to start seeing ROI.



The objective of Test Automation is to simplify testing as much as possible with minimum effort.



A platform that incorporates all the <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/essential-elements-of-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">essential elements of test automation</a> into one will make the Test Automation process in Continuous Delivery effective and affordable.



Such is <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a>, the Test Automation tool on the cloud with an in-built ecosystem of all the essential requisites to get started with Testing right away. Testsigma allows for the testing of Web, Mobile, and Web services anytime, anywhere while ensuring faster continuous delivery of the application into the market with no compromise in Quality.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Testsigma. Simple, easier, and affordable for every Agile and Continuous Delivery teams.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Sign up now</a>
</div>



<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



It is the first approach toward ensuring that your application is working as per expectations. And for years, testers have relied on manual before moving on to some other testing approach to validate the software quality. However, this process is quite tedious and requires great attention to detail to avoid issues. Challenges in testing, such as inaccuracy, time, and resources, are some of the big drivers for <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing">automation testing</a>.



Consider all the factors involved in manual and think about the challenges to ensure you are getting the best of your testing efforts.



<customlinks>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Is Manual a Good Career</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/is-manual-testing-a-good-career/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value> Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/guides/manual-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>How to Write Test Cases for Manual Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/guides/test-cases-for-manual-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Top Manual Testing Tools</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/tools/manual-testing-tools/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Manual Testing Interview Questions and Answers</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/manual-testing-interview-questions/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing-which-one-should-you-choose/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
</customlinks>

Wait a second...Did you try Testsigma?

Wait a second...
Did you try Testsigma?